They were hailed as the #1 PG and #1 SG coming out of High School. I like them, but they're learning how to play team ball.
They're both a bit slow and could be average, at best, defenders at the NBA level.
I think it's way too early though, considering it's almost an entirely all-freshman team and they're only like 12 games into their collegiate careers... not to mention they're pretty damn good as it is....... but I think their games may not translate well to the NBA.
I literally knew nothing about them going into the season, but I expected them to be much more athletic. Thought they'd be more like Wall, Bledsoe, Evans, Rose, etc. Even Teague was faster imo.
Were they ranked so highly because of their height and skill? Or were they also assumed to be superior athletically in college? Or, at least more superior than they currently are?
Do these questions make sense?