the fact that Zach Randolph has more assists than turnovers this year, at 33, means jack **** to me, dude was given 1,000,000 chances to get his **** together, he was able to string everyone along due to his over-inflated, toxic contracts. In the NFL they'd have cut his ***, twice.
my concern is what happens on the rookie deal, and that first contract after that, thats where im looking for potential to outperform the consensus, to look beyond that is fools gold. It took Zach Randolph how many years and how many teams to figure it out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh2fn01cngg
the ends do not justify the means.. how audacious do you really have to be to attempt this shot...
Would Jazzfanz really have preferred Zach Randolph and what he brought to the table the first 6-7 years in portland over Okur, who was selected 20 picks later? I think not, dude was always considered "a black hole" and a "team killer", Portland couldnt trade him without taking back 2007 steve francis, who at the time was as valuable as grade 4 toxic waste.
Ultimately what im doing is hunting for value, Im looking for favorable contracts, i view the salary cap as a system that can be gamed, something that can be easily manipulated and maneuvered around, I always said it'd be a tragedy if the Jazz traded 2 draft picks for Trey Burke, that felt, to me, like going for the gusto, All i wanted was a few value bets, though they did get that in Rudy. the Jazz should feel obligated to hunt for value the same way imo(**** the coaches input). Thats why im quick to point out when i think a projected 2nd rounder might be worthy of locking into a 4 year deal, Serge Ibaka was projected in the 40's til very late in the process.