What's new

Following potential 2017 draftees...

What's lmao about that? I'm not holding it against him. I still like him as a prospect and have him in the lottery. He doesnt have great game feel though. That's all I said. Keep searching though man.

You're not holding it against him but when you're arguing against me you will because it means he has no feel for the game when you clearly said it's hard for big men to get assists.

Backtrack some more. It's hilarious.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You're not holding it against him but when you're arguing against me you will because it means he has no feel for the game when you clearly said it's hard for big men to get assists.

Backtrack some more. It's hilarious.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app

Yes, I said "no feel for the game". I said "lack of feel"

Good lord, you are ****ing ridiculous. Really. I can defend his lack of assist as it not being an indictment on his overall value as a basketball player and point to his assist to turnover ratio as a lack of feel for the game when I'm making a comparison to a player who also has a similar limitation in his game.

Try harder.
 
Oh ****. You said Player A not being a great 3pt shooter wasnt a big deal a few months ago why did you point out Player A cant shoot later in your quick general evaluation? You said shooting wasnt a big deal for his position therefore you can never speak on it again.

^WC logic^
 
Yes, I said "no feel for the game". I said "lack of feel"

Good lord, you are ****ing ridiculous. Really. I can defend his lack of assist as it not being an indictment on his overall value as a basketball player and point to his assist to turnover ratio as a lack of feel for the game when I'm making a comparison to a player who also has a similar limitation in his game.

Try harder.

Wow.. you tried really hard explaining yourself on that one. It felt like I was reading an essay where a student had to bs his way to 100 more words. That hurt my eyes. Nice reach.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Oh ****. You said Player A not being a great 3pt shooter wasnt a big deal a few months ago why did you point out Player A cant shoot later in your quick general evaluation? You said shooting wasnt a big deal for his position therefore you can never speak on it again.

^WC logic^

You're really this mad because I used your own words to beat you in an argument?


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Zach Collins doesn't have a lot of game feel. Haven't you seen his 0.4 assists to 1.5 turnovers?

But it's hard for big men to get assists in college when they aren't involved as much and I wouldn't hold it against him.

If you aren't going to hold his lack of assists against him how can you use an assist to turnover ratio against him?

Dumb as ****. You just like to argue.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You're really this mad because I used your own words to beat you in an argument?


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app

No, I'm mad because you are being obtuse. Can you really not understand the fact you can say "Hey a big man who cant pass well isnt a big deal, it's not something I expect a big man to do at this level" and "This big man doesnt have a great feel for the game" aren't mutually exclusive thoughts and you can think both of them? You are just being a dumbass for the sake of being a dumbass.
 
Zach Collins doesn't have a lot of game feel. Haven't you seen his 0.4 assists to 1.5 turnovers?

But it's hard for big men to get assists in college when they aren't involved as much and I wouldn't hold it against him.

If you aren't going to hold his lack of assists against him how can you use an assist to turnover ratio against him?

Dumb as ****. You just like to argue.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app

You are really this stupid, arent you? Back to the ignore list you go, you really arent going to offer any interesting perspectives in this thread.
 
You are really this stupid, arent you? Back to the ignore list you go, you really arent going to offer any interesting perspectives in this thread.

"WC disagreed with me and proceeded to use my own words against me. I'm putting him on my ignore list."

What a little bitch. You can't take what you dish out.

Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
10 points and 6 rebounds on 65.2% from the field in 17 minutes a game but doesn't have a ton of feel for the game.

Dumbest **** I'm going to read all year.

Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Whoever the Jazz draft needs to be able to shoot. The Playoffs show that you can't afford to have someone on the floor who is a non-shooter. Those players will get exposed. John Wall shooting 8/23 and 1/8 on 3s pretty much took the Wizards out in the 4th quarter. It makes me worry about Exum. Hopefully, he can keep developing as a shooter.

If Hood has a bad shooting game it also puts the Jazz behind the 8-ball.
 
Markkanen is a much better shooter than Olynyk, a better player overall too.

Yeah, but does he have Kelly O's toughness? He is the better prospect for sure, but it's too early to say he is better than Olynyk. Olynyk brings some nasty to the table.
 
Jonathan Jeanne is my guy right now. Like any prospect, you can poke holes in him, but he has too much going for him at such a young age, that i wouldn't pass on him at 24. Eerily similar to Rudy at the same stage. Active on both ends of the floor, runs the floor exceptionally well, blocks shots, very good rebounder who compensates for the thin frame with toughness and a good motor. He's more skilled with the ball than Rudy, can actually shoot it a bit - though needs to improve there, not as tough or explosive at the rim as Rudy was and is even thinner.

my biggest concern is that i'm convinced he will rise up draft boards as the draft gets closer he won't be available at 24.
 
Back
Top