He's not a good defender currently. He's ok on ball, but bad off ball, although he had made some major progress in the last game I saw.Is Traore known as being a high level defender? That's really the only thing that would sway me on him. Think he just projects as very average offensively with some natural PG skills.
Size/Athleticism alone isn't enough. The shooting is enticing , I'll give you that, but I think the lack of passing feel is indicative of a lack of overall feel in general. Why isn't he a monster at the rim with his size/athleticism? Why does he settle for jumpers so much? Shouldn't he be racking up steals and blocks if he is this uber athlete with size? Not to say he is horrible on defense but everything feels a bit disappointing with him. I worry about all of that. And its a mystery to me how much he will develop.I mean, you really think someone that size/athleticism who can shoot isn't bare minimum top 15?
I think it's fair to question Ace as a shooter based on his college stats, but those who have followed him since high school don't question that part of his game.NBA Big Board threw out some shooting stat on Bailey's 3s where was over 40% on guarded 3s and under 30% on open ones.
I think he just had a bad shooting year at Rutgers.
To me Traore just looks fine. Don't see a ton of upside. Think he has to shoot to reach whatever upside he has, and the numbers just aren't encouraging.
Don't think the shot looks horrible though. I could see him as high as 18-ish.
NBA Big Board threw out some shooting stat on Bailey's 3s where was over 40% on guarded 3s and under 30% on open ones.
I think he just had a bad shooting year at Rutgers.