mellow
Well-Known Member
Admiral Schofield is also all over the boards. I've noticed him mocked in the low 20's down to the 50's. I don't know enough about the guys who are making the mocks to know if they are connected, or just making stuff up.
Following Potential Draftees - 2019 (not kidding)
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
Admiral Schofield is also all over the boards. I've noticed him mocked in the low 20's down to the 50's. I don't know enough about the guys who are making the mocks to know if they are connected, or just making stuff up.
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
do you thing he could be a "bone"afide player
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
He wont fall to the 40's. Destined for the 30-40's i think.
Game6Conley
Well-Known Member
Bruh u're turning this supposed discussion into just some exhibit of a poorly done creative writing exercise.
Sometimes less is more. It's like Fozzie Bear is holding court here sometimes.
Honestly --- How many Arkansas games and how many Texas games did u watch this season? If u're gonna type in the tone u do, at least admit what we all here know, is that ur kinda just freewheeling it.. the old throwing **** at a wall and hoping it sticks technique
Just cuz u or anyone try to frame a post in a non-committal way and then expect to defend it as such, doesnt mean its actually worth defending, it can't be baseless. and what you've posted here is just that..baseless....
what i have italicized above is most certainly a common male communication pattern in 2019, and especially from certain archetypes of dudes, mostly ones lacking perspective.
it's based off of NARRATIVE BIAS, and just look at how u construct ur sentences, u sound gullible, easily susceptible to narrative bias, u sound like ur trying to talk yourself into it.
Last edited:
seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
i mean, it was only 25 attempts, but he did hit 44% of them. i certainly wouldn't take that to mean he can shoot, but i think it could mean he has some shooting upside.
The FT% indicates he cant shoot.
The worst ting is he had an entire year off for a transfer year and somehow got that much worse at shooting.
Last edited:
seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
K. I'm not arguing he can shoot. Just that 11-25 might suggest there is some upside.
Yeah, but if he had shooting upside then why did the main statistical indicator (debatable sure, but I go with it when their isnt a big enough sample of 3 point attempts) of shooting drop so drastically?
He's probably a better vertical athlete, but he has poor athletic indicators on blocks and steals.
Seems like a guy who could be a solid career backup. Could be a Darren Collison/Mo Williams type. Athletic, but too damn small and not just fitting of his actual playstyle, but a solid overall PG. He just needs to really become a good shooter and a pest defensively.
Bruh u're turning this supposed discussion into just some exhibit of a poorly done creative writing exercise.
Sometimes less is more. It's like Fozzie Bear is holding court here sometimes.
Honestly --- How many Arkansas games and how many Texas games did u watch this season? If u're gonna type in the tone u do, at least admit what we all here know, is that ur kinda just freewheeling it.. the old throwing **** at a wall and hoping it sticks technique
Just cuz u or anyone try to frame a post in a non-committal way and then expect to defend it as such, doesnt mean its actually worth defending, it can't be baseless. and what you've posted here is just that..baseless....
what i have italicized above is most certainly a common male communication pattern in 2019, and especially from certain archetypes of dudes, mostly ones lacking perspective.
it's based off of NARRATIVE BIAS, and just look at how u construct ur sentences, u sound gullible, easily susceptible to narrative bias, u sound like ur trying to talk yourself into it.
With all due respect, what the **** are you talking about? Daniel Gafford could have entered the draft last year and been a top-20 pick. This year, he's being mocked in the late first or second round. Jaxson Hayes is younger and maybe a better prospect depending on what you're looking for -- Hayes is probably a better pure roll-man, for example -- but as prospects they shouldn't really be considered 20 or 25 spots apart. That's the discussion we're having.
The criticism of Gafford is that he didn't expand his game much in his second year. However, if you look at the role he played at Arkansas, it's pretty clear that they don't want him out on the floor trying to make plays. He dominates near the rim. He increased his minutes and his production in most categories. He worked on his body. And if you compare Jaxson Hayes' freshman stats to Gafford's it's not easy to call Hayes a much better prospect. When Arkansas and Texas matched up this year, Gafford dominated, and Hayes was still a 6th man.
If you don't agree with this take, that's fine, but it's not based on some Fozzy the Bear, narrative bias, quasi-archetype, or whatnot.
Last edited:
Based on combine numbers/performance, the possible skill set that they bring, workout buzz and a little social media conjecture... I would speculate that these guys would all be on the Jazz short list at 23 (in no particular order)..
Terence Davis
Carsen Edwards
Dylan Windler
Luka Samanic
Mfiondu Kabengele
Terence Davis
Carsen Edwards
Dylan Windler
Luka Samanic
Mfiondu Kabengele
seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
i'm convinced these guys are all over actual team boards. like there is no consensus out there. they could be completely connected and you'd still see these wild inconsistencies.
homeytennis
Well-Known Member
One of the bo
Gafford also got his coach fired he had such a good year.
homeytennis
Well-Known Member
Mike Daum of South Dakota State. 25 points 11 boards but I think he is the next Tyler Cavanaugh or Tibor Pleiss.
I like him too. My only big concerns with him are his really skinny frame and that his athleticism at the combine didn't match what I saw in games.