Our players don't seem to have improved much either
I've only seen one game this year, but I certainly saw improvements over last year from Favors, Kanter, and Hayward.
Our players don't seem to have improved much either
Also.... many do
Sure you can improve your skills with practice but you need game time to teach yourself the game.
For the record the jazz are not firing corbin midseason. Not their style. After the season I believe the jazz will hire mike longabardi. Mike currently assists horny in phoenix but he has coached under tibs and rivers. He has excellent credentials but is not a former player and thus lacks name recognition.
Which of the young players had zero game time over the previous two seasons?
I think you could argue that this is one of Corbin's strengths, especially in light of how well these young guys have responded to increased roles. You don't want to give a player too much responsibility before he's ready because he effectively skips the steps along the way that will prepare him for success. Further, Ty has always made a point of playing the young guys together, and having the m play differently than the starters. That is, Gordo, Favors, Kanter, and Burks were given greater roles with players they'd be playing with in the future in lower leverage situations (off the bench). I liked that they brought Gordo off the bench for a while last season, and allowed him to play with the ball in his hands with Kanter and Favors.You also try to put people in the right situations for them to succeed. This is what develops confidence in players, and Corbin has failed to do this.
I think you could argue that this is one of Corbin's strengths, especially in light of how well these young guys have responded to increased roles. You don't want to give a player too much responsibility before he's ready because he effectively skips the steps along the way that will prepare him for success. Further, Ty has always made a point of playing the young guys together, and having the m play differently than the starters. That is, Gordo, Favors, Kanter, and Burks were given greater roles with players they'd be playing with in the future in lower leverage situations (off the bench). I liked that they brought Gordo off the bench for a while last season, and allowed him to play with the ball in his hands with Kanter and Favors.
I'll also ask a question I've asked before, which has always gone unanswered. Can anyone name a coach who played young, inexperienced players ahead of productive, prime-age players?
Was it ever reasonable to expect Ty to bench Al or Millsap? Was Burks really ever ready to handle more responsibility/minutes on the court?
While I thought some of Al's 1st-3rd quarter minutes should have been cut to get Kanter on the court more (with more responsibility) and save Al's energy to close games, I can understand why Corbin did what he did.
I'll also ask a question I've asked before, which has always gone unanswered. Can anyone name a coach who played young, inexperienced players ahead of productive, prime-age players?
I think you could argue that this is one of Corbin's strengths, especially in light of how well these young guys have responded to increased roles. You don't want to give a player too much responsibility before he's ready because he effectively skips the steps along the way that will prepare him for success. Further, Ty has always made a point of playing the young guys together, and having the m play differently than the starters. That is, Gordo, Favors, Kanter, and Burks were given greater roles with players they'd be playing with in the future in lower leverage situations (off the bench). I liked that they brought Gordo off the bench for a while last season, and allowed him to play with the ball in his hands with Kanter and Favors.
I'll also ask a question I've asked before, which has always gone unanswered. Can anyone name a coach who played young, inexperienced players ahead of productive, prime-age players?
Was it ever reasonable to expect Ty to bench Al or Millsap? Was Burks really ever ready to handle more responsibility/minutes on the court?
While I thought some of Al's 1st-3rd quarter minutes should have been cut to get Kanter on the court more (with more responsibility) and save Al's energy to close games, I can understand why Corbin did what he did.
None of those players were really blocking the young guys.Most of your post made a lot of sense but would just like to say that I don't consider roger braille, josh howard, or earl watson productive prime age players.
No he was not.Hayward also was held back in favor of Foye and Marvin
None of those players were really blocking the young guys.
As a rookie, Burks played roughly the same minutes as Howard and more minutes than Raja. He wasn't noticeably better than either of those guys.I feel that they were blocking Burks. Hayward still got his time.
As a rookie, Burks played roughly the same minutes as Howard and more minutes than Raja. He wasn't noticeably better than either of those guys.
As a rookie, Burks played roughly the same minutes as Howard and more minutes than Raja. He wasn't noticeably better than either of those guys.
He was clearly better then Bell. Howard is debatable.
I remember someone posting some stats showing that braille was the worst player in the league or something. (Might have been worst sg or wing in the leaguel
Wasn't Raja told to stay home? CJ only missed 10 games. CJ and Howard were better options at that point, and, AGAIN, Alec was a rookie. Not playing a mediocre rookie over mediocre vets doesn't seem to be that big a deal.Are you saying total minutes? If so that is just stupid since burks was the only healthy wing.
Raja, howard and cj were all injured.
I don't remember raja or howard getting any dnps until after thier injuries.
If there is one characteristic that I have learned about GVC, its that he is always right in his mind so this conversation is pointless.