What's new
By:

Free Agent Rumors Thread

Bucks sign Kendall Marshall. We could get him. Not sure if he'd accept being the 3rd choice PG though.
 
mellow said:
I know he had some moments, but I don't think he has shown he can play consistent quality minutes at the three.
Click to expand...

I agree. He has not been played at the three enough to show he can play consistent quality minutes there.

This year he will though
 
green said:
Wasn't Burks' PER 15.8 last year? Isn't 15 average? So, against backups, he was slightly better than average? And yet, make him a starter, and he is going to suddenly blow up?

Yeah. Not buying it.
Click to expand...
Hayward got hurt, burks started, scored 34 pts.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Just not enough 3pt shooting to space the floor for Quin's offense, tbh. Exum cant shooะ it. Burks and Hayward are inconsistent. Too easy for opponent to clog the lane.


Also who's gonna be your scoring 6th man?
Click to expand...
Who is indiana pacers scoring sixth man?
How about miamis?
Golden states?
Houston?
Portland?

I dont think that you have to have a scoring 6th man to be successful
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];876810 said:
I'm afraid this phrase has gotten stuck in the stupppidasss echo chamber.

Why don't you just put this in your signature?

I like the misspelling, btw. Keep that part.
Click to expand...

You mean like your "Gordon getting paid, bitch" mantra just to remind us all how painful matching the MAX contract was?
 
fishonjazz said:
Who is indiana pacers scoring sixth man?
How about miamis?
Golden states?
Houston?
Portland?

I dont think that you have to have a scoring 6th man to be successful
Click to expand...

Spurs has Ginobili (won more Chips than all those teams combined), and the last I checked that's the model we're working off of.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Spurs has Ginobili (won more Chips than all those teams combined), and the last I checked that's the model we're working off of.
Click to expand...
You seemed like you were saying that a team can not be successful without a scoring 6th man. I simply disagree.

I also believe that the spurs would have still been successful if ginobli started for them all those years. (iirc ginobli did start sometimes)
 
fishonjazz said:
You seemed like you were saying that a team can not be successful without a scoring 6th man. I simply disagree.

I also believe that the spurs would have still been successful if ginobli started for them all those years. (iirc ginobli did start sometimes)
Click to expand...

But they didn't though. Pop is very deliberate, there is a reason he had Ginobili coming off the bench even as recently as this year when they won their last Championship.


Burks can be just as valuable in that role.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
But they didn't though. Pop is very deliberate, there is a reason he had Ginobili coming off the bench even as recently as this year when they won their last Championship.


Burks can be just as valuable in that role.
Click to expand...
Couldnt burks also be valuable as a starter?

I have heard haywards game is more similar to ginoblis, maybe hayward should come off the bench.
 
fishonjazz said:
Couldnt burks also be valuable as a starter?

I have heard haywards game is more similar to ginoblis, maybe hayward should come off the bench.
Click to expand...

Hayward is a lot less explosive getting to the rim though. Also we're not paying him MAX money just to play 25-30 min. a game.


Burks attacks the rim much better, and since he's played the PG for us before his playmaking is right up there. He just needs to work on his 3pt shooting.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Also we're not paying him MAX money just to play 25-30 min. a game.
Click to expand...

it seems like the spurs/pop model wouldnt let salary dictate how a player is used.
Seems like the spurs would do whatever is best for the team to win
 
fishonjazz said:
it seems like the spurs/pop model wouldnt let salary dictate how a player is used.
Seems like the spurs would do whatever is best for the team to win
Click to expand...

Well I just think Hayward's length is better served at the defensive end as a starter. Burks is not a great defender so he is better placed in the 2nd unit where he wouldn't have to do a lot defensively, and can just attack the basket which is what he does best.
 
green said:
One game? Or did he average 34 over half a season?
Click to expand...
Like i said. You should look up his stats as a starter.

There was a 5 game stretch when hayward was hurt and he scored 16, 34, 20, 6 (burks was +16 and only played 28 minutes cause the jazz won by 21 pts) and 18.

An average of 19 pts per game as a starter and that is including his 6 pt game when he only took 2 shots in a jazz blowout victory.
He also averaged about 5 assists in those games that hayward was out.

They won 2 of those games and lost 3 (one of the losses was a 4 pt loss on the road against san antonio) and that is with our "best" player (hayward) out so our depth/bench was even worse than normal.
 
Last edited:
fishonjazz said:
Like i said. You should look up his stats as a starter.

There was a 5 game stretch when hayward was hurt and he scored 16, 34, 20, 6 (burks was +16 and only played 28 minutes cause the jazz won by 21 pts) and 18.

An average of 19 pts per game as a starter and that is including his 6 pt game when he only took 2 shots in a jazz blowout victory.
He also averaged about 5 assists in those games that hayward was out.

They won 2 of those games and lost 3 (one of the losses was a 4 pt loss on the road against san antonio) and that is with our "best" player (hayward) out so our depth/bench was even worse than normal.
Click to expand...

Loved those 5 games... Everyone always holds Hayward as this complete player and that's why he is head over heels better than burks, but those 5 games showed that burks could take on that Hayward's role and do it just as good or dare I say even better than Hayward!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top