Game #10 : Lakers at Utah, Wednesday 01/11/2012 7:00 PM MST

[sepanol]

You make the most sense on this board. Please post more.

Why? did he ever say Valanciunas is better than Kanter? he just said Kanter is bad

 

[m3at]

All I know is that I am desperate to get rid of Millsap. Has anyone ever noticed just how short and worthless he is, im sry 2 short 4ever im sory okay

lulz. great post!

"You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to NUMBERICA again."

 

[fishonjazz]

prove it

So you want proof that MK11 didn't have any effect on the game.
Look at the box score: MK11 had zero points, rebounds, turnovers, fouls, assists, minutes, steals, etc etc.

I just proved it... you idiot.

 

[Jeffrey32]

I know Harris hit a game-winning shot recently, but the offense was much more in rhythm in the fourth quarter with Earl running the show. If anything, Ty could have put Earl and Harris on the floor for the fourth quarter together, at elast for the last 2 minutes.

 

[NUMBERICA]

I couldn't disagree more. Are we watching the same team? Millsap is the guy who is contributing and defending. He was able to control Gasol a little bit. Al Jeff on the other hand was worthless last night. If you want to get rid of a big, at least make it the big that won't move the ball or defend the paint.

Re-check your sarcasmometer.

 

[NUMBERICA]

nah, Kobe missed more than he made.
you'd rather the whole laker team go off?

He also got to the line a ****load. Don't think of it as 14-31 (which is impressive by itself considering the sheer load), think of it as 40 points (or was it a little more?) on 31 shots. Which efficiency-wise isn't GREAT, but it is good, and when you consider how much of the offense relied on him (Bynum and Gasol were practically shut down, no one else is very good nor stepped up, he scored almost half of the team's points), it was a very, very impressive performance. Most of the shots he put up were within the offense.

 

[northeast]

He also got to the line a ****load. Don't think of it as 14-31 (which is impressive by itself considering the sheer load), think of it as 40 points (or was it a little more?) on 31 shots. Which efficiency-wise isn't GREAT, but it is good, and when you consider how much of the offense relied on him (Bynum and Gasol were practically shut down, no one else is very good nor stepped up, he scored almost half of the team's points), it was a very, very impressive performance. Most of the shots he put up were within the offense.

I didn't say he had a bad game. I just don't think the jazz would have been better off giving Bynum and Gasol open layups.

 

[sepanol]

He also got to the line a ****load. Don't think of it as 14-31 (which is impressive by itself considering the sheer load), think of it as 40 points (or was it a little more?) on 31 shots. Which efficiency-wise isn't GREAT, but it is good, and when you consider how much of the offense relied on him (Bynum and Gasol were practically shut down, no one else is very good nor stepped up, he scored almost half of the team's points), it was a very, very impressive performance. Most of the shots he put up were within the offense.

No, if Kobe made 5-5 ,10 points, would be much more successful, now he is like 40%, would have been 100% instead