What's new
By:

Game 3: 11/1/14 Suns at Jazz 7 p.m. ROOT (TV)

LazyD said:
So is it automatically a blocking foul if a player contests from within the circle? Or can it be a no call?
Click to expand...
Great question.
I have no clue.

I hear about this verticality rule or whatever but I don't know how it works in the circle
 
LazyD said:
So is it automatically a blocking foul if a player contests from within the circle? Or can it be a no call?
Click to expand...
I think it's automatically a blocking foul doe
 
dalamon said:
Anyone know Derrick's career high? Cant be >30.
Click to expand...

28 points

DeliciousUnfitHornshark.gif
 
dalamon said:
no, ECTYA said he'd be a poor man's Hayward. Duckwing said that he'd be an end-of-the-bench scrub, which seemed to be agreed upon by nearly the entire forum. Maybe i mixed that up with you agreeing as well.

Wont forget the hilarity behind you asserting that Ingles can't be better at any one skill than any established NBA starter tho. yikes.
Click to expand...

Again saying words that I didn't say. I said better at any one skill than Hayward (who is an established NBA starter). Of course Ingles is going to be a better shooter than, let's say Favors, who is also an established NBA starter. Stop making **** up,, it's getting annoying.
 
fishonjazz said:
I think it's automatically a blocking foul doe
Click to expand...

It's not. It should have been vertically no call.

The circle is just a guide. You can't take a charge within the circle on a regular drive (if the offense player pushes off, uses off hand, etc it can be an offensive foul).
 
Cy said:
Again saying words that I didn't say. I said better at any one skill than Hayward (who is an established NBA starter). Of course Ingles is going to be a better shooter than, let's say Favors, who is also an established NBA starter. Stop making **** up,, it's getting annoying.
Click to expand...

Nope, you might you wanna go back to your old post. You weren't talking about Hayward discretely. Maybe it was your intention, but your wording didn't reflect that.
 
Cy said:
Again saying words that I didn't say. I said better at any one skill than Hayward (who is an established NBA starter). Of course Ingles is going to be a better shooter than, let's say Favors, who is also an established NBA starter. Stop making **** up,, it's getting annoying.
Click to expand...

Dude, you clearly said that Ingles can't be better at anything than any NBA starter. Let's limit that to his position only, just for you, what does that change?
 
dalamon said:
Nope, you might you wanna go back to your old post. You weren't talking about Hayward discretely. Maybe it was your intention, but your wording didn't reflect that.
Click to expand...

I don't have to, because I know what I said and am not making up things you said.
 
Elephant in the living room says: "I think Dante Exum might be a better shooter (and defender and passer) than Trey Burke already."
 
Cy said:
It's not. It should have been vertically no call.

The circle is just a guide. You can't take a charge within the circle on a regular drive (if the offense player pushes off, uses off hand, etc it can be an offensive foul).
Click to expand...

Not sure what that means.
 
Hekate said:
Dude, you clearly said that Ingles can't be better at anything than any NBA starter. Let's limit that to his position only, just for you, what does that change?
Click to expand...

its honestly as ridiculous as his initial point to begin with.

when Beverley was in China he wasn't as good at defending as Hayward.

But now that he's in the NBA and got All-NBA defense, well, now he's a better defender.

(??)
 
Hekate said:
Dude, you clearly said that Ingles can't be better at anything than any NBA starter. Let's limit that to his position only, just for you, what does that change?
Click to expand...

Context: I was talking about Hayward. Funny as **** how y'all want to make things up about what I said or the context of what I said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top