What's new

Gobert for Sacramento's #8 and baggage.

framer

Well-Known Member
The Sacramento Kings' latest ploy to trade for an unguaranteed Kevin Love is the sign of a larger problem for them. They are on the clock with Cousins and their roster is filled like the Island of Misfit Toys. I believe they are just as interested in wiping contracts off the books as they are in actually getting the services of Love. If their gambit falls through, there might be an opportunity for the Jazz to do another Golden State move.

Jazz Take: Derrick Williams, Carl Landry, the ghost of Jason Terry, #8 pick
Jazz Give: Rudy Gobert

That's it, we give Rudy Gobert who would actually fit in well in Sacramento because he would never touch the ball and would only be there for defense. We take on 17 million in salaries, 11 million of which falls off the books next year as long as we don't extend Williams. Landry is a problem as he has 3 years left at 6 million. This puts Sacramanto 11 million under the cap and allows them to sign Thomas without problems and look for a vet to fill out the bench. They have enough young blood so they don't have to worry about adding more draft picks and need to start winning now.

The Jazz get #5 and #8 which gives us a lot of possibilities. Landry as the last big off the bench doesn't suck either and him and Terry could provide leadership without demanding a ton of time on the court. Williams might give us something or not, but he is only taking up space for a year.

Do you do this deal? Who do you get at #5 and #8, or what do you think we could flip #5 and #8 for?
 
So would I. Give the new coach 1 year with the team before the Jazz go for it.

Won't happen. Not even sure it can happen tbh.
 
If the Kings don't get Love, this deal would be VERY possible, and the Sac fans would probably endorse it as they are tired of being locked into their current roster situation. The financials fit as long as we waive all cap holds minus Hayward. So we probably wouldn't be bringing Marvin Williams back, but with two new rookies plus Landry and D Williams, I'm not sure we would need him anyway. We could probably throw in #23 to Sac if they screamed too loud, because we certainly wouldn't be bringing in another Rookie plus possibly Neto.
 
I'd do it, try to move up. If I couldn't move #5 and #8 for a top 3 pick, I'd take Vonleh and Smart, then cut DWill and try to bring another vet.

I like Terry and Landry on the team. Bring back Marvin and you might make the playoffs.

Burke/Smart
Hayward/Burks/Terry
Marvin/Hayward/Evans
Kanter/Vonleh/Landry
Favors/Kanter/Vonleh

Or

Burke/Terry/Neto
Hayward/Burks/Terry
Parker or Wiggins/Hayward/Marvin
Kanter/Landry/Marvin/Parker
Favors/Kanter
 
I think Sacramento is looking for solid veteran for the #8, not a project like Gobert. I think Houston could be a viable trade partner for Sac, with Asik/Lin + #25 for the #8.
 
I'm not too worried about Gobert "blowing up". He will be a nice piece and that's it.

Also, there is no way Sacrmento does this. This trade is equal to the GS trade, except there isn't a FA Sac really wants, the 8 pick is a good pick and Gobert is a nothing right now.

You'd probably have to do Kanter, Burks for #8, Terry, Landry, and Williams. I'd fight for another future first in 2016 or 2017. Then I'd consider doing it, and I'd definitely do it if I knew I could get a top 3 pick.
 
There is nothing wrong with vets, nothing. The team will need some experience anyways. It is all in how they are used.

You need vets who can play and aren't worse than your young guys. Bringing in Tinsley, Watson etc has not worked.
 
Terry and Williams are expiring. Rudy Gay is also expiring. They've had Thomas for 3 seasons, so they have his Bird Rights and can go over the cap to re-sign him. They won't have to dump much salary, if any, to re-sign Thomas AND stay out of the luxury tax. I see no reason why Sacramento does this.
 
Back
Top