What's new

Golden State Warriors: Over or Under?

I was thinking that, but then again, they have to be the shallowest team in the league right now. Plus, two of their best players play the same position and Lee will still be undersized.

This is true, and I'm not saying it is a bad bet; they have some of the best crash-and-burn potential this year. But I see them as more mediocre than terribad. We'll see!
 
Over.

Golden State had more than 25 (26) last year even though they had the worst injury problems in the league and were starting D-leaguers by the end of the season.

Their luck almost has to be better this season plus they added at least one quality player in the front court.
 
Over.

Golden State had more than 25 (26) last year even though they had the worst injury problems in the league and were starting D-leaguers by the end of the season.

Their luck almost has to be better this season plus they added at least one quality player in the front court.

I don't know if their injuries were worse than Portland, but point taken. Again, who does the Warriors have that is better besides Lee?
 
I don't know if their injuries were worse than Portland, but point taken. Again, who does the Warriors have that is better besides Lee?

montallis one of the best scorers in the league
steven curray second best rookie last year
jeremy lim best asian amaerican in the ABA
vladmeer radmanovick best ex laker in san francisco
 
I'm pretty sure Monta Ellis isn't going to be able to explode like that every game. They still have not bench, besides Reggie Williams, if you want to call him a bench player.
 
2-12 in their last 14 games. I go back to my original claim that they have no depth. If anyone gets injured in their starting five (right now Curry) they're screwed.
 
I'd probably say over. I agree that they are not the deepest team in the league, but I see them at about 30-35 wins this season.
 
Back
Top