What's new

green's annual crazy *** fix for the Jazz

Living in MA, I watch a lot of Celtics games. Avery Bradley would be a great acquisition for this team. Boston seems to love him but with IT due for a max extension, Horford already locked in on the max, Bradley entering the final year of his contract (presumably in line for a big contract), & the presence of Smart & possibly Fultz, the Celtics could decide to trade him in order to maintain payroll flexibility. What they decide to do with their plethora of assets will likely be the determining factor.

Acquiring him would take a significant haul so IMO it should only be done with the intention of retaining him long-term, which likely wouldn't be financially possible if we pay Hill. But if he was available & we are able to retain Hayward while letting Hill walk, personally, I would give up a significant package for him (assuming we're able to re-sign him the following off-season).

IMO Bradley may be the best (realistic) addition to a core of Hayward & Gobert as he is not only young but would be a great fit. He plays well off the ball, is an elite perimeter defender, a very good outside shooter, & would bring a toughness/relentlessness that would fit perfectly with this team's culture & Rudy's drive/intensity.

Although he wouldn't be that 3rd superstar, IMO he would be an excellent Pippen to our 2 Jordans (just an analogy, not an actual comparison). I would be much more comfortable committing to him long-term than Hill (even with the loss of assets used to acquire him, assuming it's within reason).
 
Living in MA, I watch a lot of Celtics games. Avery Bradley would be a great acquisition for this team. Boston seems to love him but with IT due for a max extension, Horford already locked in on the max, Bradley entering the final year of his contract (presumably in line for a big contract), & the presence of Smart & possibly Fultz, the Celtics could decide to trade him in order to maintain payroll flexibility. What they decide to do with their plethora of assets will likely be the determining factor.

Acquiring him would take a significant haul so IMO it should only be done with the intention of retaining him long-term, which likely wouldn't be financially possible if we pay Hill. But if he was available & we are able to retain Hayward while letting Hill walk, personally, I would give up a significant package for him (assuming we're able to re-sign him the following off-season).

IMO Bradley may be the best (realistic) addition to a core of Hayward & Gobert as he is not only young but would be a great fit. He plays well off the ball, is an elite perimeter defender, a very good outside shooter, & would bring a toughness/relentlessness that would fit perfectly with this team's culture & Rudy's drive/intensity.

Although he wouldn't be that 3rd superstar, IMO he would be an excellent Pippen to our 2 Jordans (just an analogy, not an actual comparison). I would be much more comfortable committing to him long-term than Hill (even with the loss of assets used to acquire him, assuming it's within reason).
Good post
 
Indy would never take that deal. That's awful.

And Lowry will take $20 million less than what he could to play in Utah? Naw.

Actually the Indy scenario is the most realistic. They have no leverage trading George. Getting two young players with some upside and 2 first round picks for a guy that is leaving, and is a one-year rental is probably a bit of an overpay. It might take something like this to get them to do it, though. It wouldn't surprise me if they try to trade PG at the draft. I'm sure they want a better pick, but beggers can't always be choosers.
 
ok here is a scenario

Jazz Draft Frank jackson, DJ Wilson, PJ Dozier

Jazz trade Lyles, Favors and Burks to the Cavs for David Love

With the acquisition of either Paul george or Jimmy butler the Jazz package Hood and a couple future 1st rounders for Avery Bradly

Jazz Sign Milos Teodisic for Europe 4 years 40 million

For giggles JeVale McGee

Teodisic, Exum, Neto
Bradly, Jackson, Dozier
Hayward, Ingles
Love, Johnson, Wilson
Gobert, mcgee, Bolomboy
 
ok here is a scenario

Jazz Draft Frank jackson, DJ Wilson, PJ Dozier

Jazz trade Lyles, Favors and Burks to the Cavs for David Love

With the acquisition of either Paul george or Jimmy butler the Jazz package Hood and a couple future 1st rounders for Avery Bradly

Jazz Sign Milos Teodisic for Europe 4 years 40 million

For giggles JeVale McGee

Teodisic, Exum, Neto
Bradly, Jackson, Dozier
Hayward, Ingles
Love, Johnson, Wilson
Gobert, mcgee, Bolomboy

Lyles, Favors, and Burks could probably get David Love. https://www.espn.com/mma/fighter/_/id/2501536/david-love

Probably can't get Kevin Love though.

What assets are we using to get Paul George after we spent them all on David Love and Avery Bradley?

How much thought did you put into this?
 
Actually the Indy scenario is the most realistic. They have no leverage trading George. Getting two young players with some upside and 2 first round picks for a guy that is leaving, and is a one-year rental is probably a bit of an overpay. It might take something like this to get them to do it, though. It wouldn't surprise me if they try to trade PG at the draft. I'm sure they want a better pick, but beggers can't always be choosers.

The issue is the Pacers go to the Lakers and tell them Utah is offering legitimate assets for PG. That might make Magic Johnson laugh, or it might make him go to Pelinka to offer up assets for PG. Lakers can definitely out offer Utah in an asset contest. Just depends on how much they worry about PG staying with Utah if we trade for him.
 
George wasn't on the roster. I had him going to the Celtics that is why the jazz could get bradly

Sent from my Z981 using JazzFanz mobile app

So why do the two top Eastern confernce teams both want to get worse by giving us Kevin Love and Avery Bradley for inferior players? I dont see the need for Boston to add late round draft picks when they have Brooklyn's picks and I see even less reason for the Cavs to get rid of Kevin Love when he has been so great for them.
 
I do think that George is a realistic possibility and Utah should push hard for him.

Yeah, George wants LA. But, you pair him with Gordon and Gobert and that is a trio with 60 win potential.

Force George to leave more money and more wins on the table to go to LA.

If we win 60 games, I'd bet he stays.
 
Plus, neither Hayward or Gobert will fight with George for shots.

George would be the #1 option.
 
Back
Top