But we're still SOLID, right?
Yup... we were leading at 1 point right? It's not like we got blown out.
But we're still SOLID, right?
We hardly ever get blown out.
That wouldn't be painful enough, you see.
So weird how we always lose in a similar fashion.
We need that 'closer' .... desperately.
Jazz are still sitting at 12 in the draft, with a brutal stretch ahead of them. . . If they lose to New Orleans (again) and Golden State, then I think they'll fall to #10 (with Milwaukee and Orlando moving up) they go full tank mode. At this point, that might be the best thing for them. Take their top 10 pick, plus other future picks to go out and get that offensive star that they desperately need.
Don't need an offensive star as much as we need depth and a defense that can get a stop every now and then at the end of games.
This man knows his stuff, so right about sell high on Gobert.I didn't watch the game, but the tale of the quarters was sure weird, Blew them out in the 1st and 3rd (starters?) and got killed in the 2nd and 4th. To me that points to the bench. However, I'm pretty worried about end of game situations. Exum will do nothing to improve our scoring, So can Utah have a lineup of Favors, Gobert, Hayward, Hood and Exum? The first four + Mack or Neto have proven horrible on defense at the end of games - in addition to the fact they just can't score. I'm really not sure Gobert and Favors can be on the court together. They both need to be inside. Hate to say this, but I think this summer is critical for Gobert. If Rudy can't get his act together and improve his offense, hands, and FT shooting, it might be time to put Favors at the 5, get a stretch-4 and sell high on Rudy. Gobert can be a great defender, but he's such a liability in offense. Alternately, I guess you could trade Favors, but he's a true two-way player,
Just one game