What's new
By:

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016​


WASHINGTON — The Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified Wednesday that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.

The comments by Michael Daniel, who served as White House “cyber security coordinator” between 2012 and January of last year, provided his first public confirmation of a much-discussed passage in the book, “Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump,” co-written by this reporter and David Corn, that detailed his thwarted efforts to respond to the Russian attack.

www.yahoo.com

Obama cyber chief confirms 'stand down' order against Russian cyberattacks in summer 2016

Michael Daniel, Obama White House’s chief cyber official testified that proposals he was developing to counter Russia’s attack on the U.S. presidential election were put on a “back burner” after he was ordered to “stand down” his efforts in the summer of 2016.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
JazzyFresh said:
Your stupid fear mongering article literally, and i mean literally doesn't mention collusion once. NOT ONCE...
Click to expand...
Sure. I can help you. Here. Go to the section Myth: Mueller found “no collusion”: It concludes by stating “while none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion” “. There’s a section on the “no obstruction” myth as well:

,https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/
 
JazzyFresh said:
"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”

Is this really difficult to understand?
Click to expand...
But members of the campaign were charged and convicted.
Is that hard to understand?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Red said:
Sure. I can help you. Here. Go to the section Myth: Mueller found “no collusion”: It concludes by stating “while none of these acts amounted to the crime of conspiracy, all could be described as “collusion”. There’s a section on the “no obstruction” myth as well:

,https://time.com/5610317/mueller-report-myths-breakdown/
Click to expand...
"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
 
JazzyFresh said:
"We did not address ‘collusion,’ which is not a legal term,” Mueller added. “Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.”
Click to expand...
But members of the campaign were charged and convicted.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Lol RQD, Qne Brow, and 2 Pie
Hax0rs said:
Would this be the same as Hunter Biden committing a felony gun crime, not being charged, and then blaming Joe Biden?
Click to expand...
arctic-circle-menu-halibut-shrimp-chicken-salads-originals-jpg.10879
 
Lets be clear... Hillary Clinton paid Steele money for a Dossier on Trump that we now know was Russian propaganda. HIllary legitimately colluded and Obamas FBI lied to courts to illegally spy on the Trump campaign all over Russian propaganda. This is fact... Not some alt left Time article.
 
Collusion... AP leans left.

The Democratic Party-financed dossier, once celebrated by liberal Washington politicians and journalists, is officially debunked, according to a review of special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page investigative report.

Dossier creator Christopher Steele, who was paid with money from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, leveled at least a dozen Russian election conspiracy charges against President Trump and associates.

Virtually all his information came from Kremlin intelligence, according to the dossier. Mrs. Clinton’s operatives spread the document to the Justice Department, the FBI and news outlets.

apnews.com

Robert Mueller's report debunks Russia dossier

The Democratic Party-financed dossier, once celebrated by liberal Washington politicians and journalists, is officially debunked, according to a review of special counsel Robert Mueller's 448-page investigative report...
apnews.com apnews.com
 
JazzyFresh said:
Yup... Just maybe. Hypothetically.

Conspiracy....
Click to expand...
This is very, very deceptive of you, amounting to taking a part of my quote out of context to falsely paint it into a different context. That is 100% dishonest of you. My full quote was “So maybe the full memo is right around the corner”, meaning, as you know, since you are deliberately leaving out the full sentence, that maybe we will eventually see Barr’s memo. I was not talking about hypothetical conspiracies at all, but simply the release of the memo. And you know that. I do try to address you respectfully, but I do totally understand the game you are playing, and that you have no intention of being honest within any of the threads you’ve rejoined since your return. This particular sleight of hand on your part is silly I think. You really cannot win with me. I may allow you to think you have at times, by simply not replying to a particular retort on your part, but you can’t beat me.
 
Off
Red said:
This is very, very deceptive of you, amounting to taking a part of my quote out of context to falsely paint it into a different context. That is 100% dishonest of you. My full quote was “So maybe the full memo is right around the corner”, meaning, as you know, since you are deliberately leaving out the full sentence, that maybe we will eventually see Barr’s memo. I was not talking about hypothetical conspiracies at all, but simply the release of the memo. And you know that. I do try to address you respectfully, but I do totally understand the game you are playing, and that you have no intention of being honest within any of the threads you’ve rejoined since your return. This particular sleight of hand on your part is silly I think. You really cannot win with me. I may allow you to think you have at times, by simply not replying to a particular retort on your part, but you can’t beat me.
Click to expand...
I posted a direct quote from Mueller saying there wasn't substantial evidence to charge anybody. You are saying he's wrong. Who's being disingenuous here?
 
It's like the New York DA coming out and saying that Trump was under criminal investigation. Now we know there are only minor minor very minor infractions that arent even going to amount to nothing more than a fine.

Propaganda
 
Hax0rs said:
Would this be the same as Hunter Biden committing a felony gun crime, not being charged, and then blaming Joe Biden?
Click to expand...
Nope.
This was members of the trump campaign. Hunter Biden was not a member of trumps campaign

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
JazzyFresh said:
Off

I posted a direct quote from Mueller saying there wasn't substantial evidence to charge anybody. You are saying he's wrong. Who's being disingenuous here?
Click to expand...
Well ya he was wrong. Many people were charged.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
JazzyFresh said:
It's like the New York DA coming out and saying that Trump was under criminal investigation. Now we know there are only minor minor very minor infractions that arent even going to amount to nothing more than a fine.

Propaganda
Click to expand...
Why would he get fined if there was no wrongdoing?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top