Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
![]()
myself included
We didn't need this thread, obviously, to know that I'm an idiot.
Yes, we're all idiots. It's the dumbasses that don't realize they're idiots that you gotta watch out for.
![]()
myself included
Sometimes, it's about the lurkers. I don't think any of use expect Cosmored to change.No problem here, dude. Keep fighting the good fight. I'm sure, with enough opposition Cosmored will either give up, get stumped or change his mind.
If I ever see the hoax proof debunked, I'll change.I don't think any of use expect Cosmored to change.
Sometimes, it's about the lurkers. I don't think any of use expect Cosmored to change.
Liar, you've had it debunked and you haven't removed one single item from your wall of spam. Your response is ad hominem BS - you completely ignore the whole thing.If I ever see the hoax proof debunked, I'll change.
You people have the attitude that you've debunked it but you haven't.
You people have the attitude that you've debunked it but you haven't.
I replied to that a long time ago.How have you explained the closing lid draft? You haven't. It proves it must be in a vacuum. You just avoid it, you are afraid to admit you are wrong.
Clavius is a disinfo site. Click on the Web Forum.Clavius: Conspiracy - the problem of scale
You sad, sad liar. You have NOT addressed it you have avoided it. Your cowardly action is really quite pathetic.I replied to that a long time ago.
You are so afraid at admitting you are wrong. Once again with your spam response. A massive blog, itemising and dealing with every single bit of your wall of spam and your response is arm waving cowardice. You have spent most of your adult life making this BS claim on countless message boards and blogs, so it is impossioble for your brain to understand how it has been wrong all that time.Your position on that is pretty lame.
Hey look over here and ignore totally the content of an expert in space travel and rocketry . An ad hominem based on your ridiculous "credibility test" that is BS in the first place. I laugh at you saying you will change when you see it all debunked and then ignore everywhere where it is soundly trashed.Clavius is a disinfo site. Click on the Web Forum.
Look at what Jay Windley* says in post #26 of this page.
The bottom line is that the only identifiable force that would make the dust move in that manner is air. Vibration wouldn't do it. Either there's only air blowing out at the corner, or there's only dust at the corner. The movement of the dust proves they were in air.Now, once again the falling lid. Here is a demo showing a piece of board about a quarter of the size of the battery lid and just gently dropping, not pushed shut!
The bottom line is
the only identifiable force that would make the dust move in that manner is air.
Vibration wouldn't do it.
WHAT!? The whole area is completely covered in dust and your voice over on the video shoots himself in the foot by pointing it out. The fool in your video correctly identifies the dust all over and fails to see the obvious falling wave of air would send it all over the place.Either there's only air blowing out at the corner, or there's only dust at the corner.
The movement of the dust proves they were in air.
Feel free to list 5 things that could change your mind, and let's see how reasonable you are with your standards.If I ever see the hoax proof debunked, I'll change.
Nor do I think any lurker is going to be convinced outside of those who are contrarians, easily convinced, young, naive, etc.Sometimes, it's about the lurkers. I don't think any of use expect Cosmored to change.
Footage with no anomalies and movements consistent with lunar gravity would convince me but it all points to a hoax. There is zero proof that they went* and there's a mountain of proof that they didn't go**.Feel free to list 5 things that could change your mind, and let's see how reasonable you are with your standards.
But if we've never been to the moon then how are you gonna be convinced?Footage with no anomalies and movements consistent with lunar gravity would convince me but it all points to a hoax.
They've actually studied this. A small percentage can be swayed by unopposed disinformation.Nor do I think any lurker is going to be convinced outside of those who are contrarians, easily convinced, young, naive, etc.
So, you don't care, and this discussion between us is over?Who cares? It's a discussion forum on the the internet. It's posted in a GD forum on a Utah Jazz page.
Footage with no anomalies and movements consistent with lunar gravity would convince me but it all points to a hoax.
Ridiculous statement. There are 842lbs of lunar samples, examined by the world's finest geologists. Samples that show no signs of terrestrial weathering, copious amounts of solar isotopes, no fusion crusts, signs of formation in low gravity, bone dry and impossible to fake. There are hundreds of pieces of footage that demonstrate lighting, lunar gravity and overall motion that is impossible to replicate on Earth. Footage with dark skies, massive evenly lit terrain and only one single light. Every single time anything is presented to you, you become the worst troll on the web with denial.There is zero proof that they went*
and there's a mountain of proof that they didn't go**.
Post something you consider to be proof that they went and we can talk about whether it's really proof.
My grandfather's home movies taken in the 1960s and 1970s all had anomalies. You're taking about film that went through severe g-forces and mild radiation twice. That standard is unrealistic and unreasonable.Footage with no anomalies and movements consistent with lunar gravity would convince me
I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I'm just checking to see if you are a reasonable person, and you are not. I'm good.Post something you consider to be proof that they went and we can talk about whether it's really proof.
So, basically, I was right.They've actually studied this. A small percentage can be swayed by unopposed disinformation.
http://www.geschichteinchronologie.com/atmosphaerenfahrt/28_moon-stones-from-Earth-ENGL.htmlidiculous statement. There are 842lbs of lunar samples, examined by the world's finest geologists. Samples that show no signs of terrestrial weathering, copious amounts of solar isotopes, no fusion crusts, signs of formation in low gravity, bone dry and impossible to fake. There are hundreds of pieces of footage that demonstrate lighting, lunar gravity and overall motion that is impossible to replicate on Earth. Footage with dark skies, massive evenly lit terrain and only one single light. Every single time anything is presented to you, you become the worst troll on the web with denial.