How can the Jazz really get rid of most of the veterans?

[Bodhi]

I don't know if you've read, but Jefferson worked really hard during the offseason. It's true and matters, because he talked about it a lot.

I hadn't heard,..... go on!

 

[franklin]

Harris, Jefferson, Miles, Bell and two 2nd rounders for Rondo and Garnett's expiring.

Boom. We lose our ****heads, get a true point guard, and Garnett for one season to teach our youth how to be badasses.

I'd trade Jefferson for the corpse of Garnett straight up.

You two aren't Jazz fans.

I hadn't heard,..... go on!

He jumps really high now and stuff. Haven't you seen all them nasty Al dunkzz?

 

[Darkwing Duck]

A trade that would work for the Jazz, since trade rules are 150% this year and not 125%, as the ESPN trade machine still uses, is Jefferson for Jermaine O'neal, Chris Wilcox (probably waived), Avery Bradley (rookie contract), Clippers first (has protections) and Celtics first (hopefully unprotected, but probably would end up protected).

Hopefully Boston panics and does something like this to make one more run. Jefferson is only two years, so they can flip him next off season.

 

[theonlyone]

It's more or less a pipe dream. You can't go into full rebuild mode under the current CBA because rookie contracts will never add up to even half the minimum.

Thanks, that is what I thought. I guess the Jazz are pretty much stuck with the current veterans except if they get someone with a similar salary in return.