Right, because a church should spend billions of dollars "revitalizing" a city that is already many times more wealthy than most of the rest of the world. It baffles me that people who belong to a church of Jesus Christ, a man who stood for everything this revitalization project does not, aren't up in arms about this. Do you really think if the Savior was the one calling the shots this is how he'd choose to spend the church's money? Imagine how many schools in Africa could have been built, or starving children fed with these billions of dollars. It's sickening.
Edit: This isn't really a reply to the point you were making. Your post just kind of got me thinking.
Noted. There has been much said about the priorities of the church, relative to this project, so I won't continue to beat that horse, but I get the sense that many view the church's financial model as one big pile of money that goes here and there, and that more of the pile went to a mall than goes to humanitarian endeavors. For example:
Archie doesn't it seem odd the church has spent more money on a mall then in charitable donations?
I think it's important to bear in mind that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is a different entity than The Corporation of the First Presidency, or what ever other business arms they operate. If my tithes and offerings were being used for urban renewal, rather than directly for church infrastructure and humanitarian reasons, I'd be pretty pissed. But (to my knowledge) they aren't. The church has specific interest in Salt Lake City and the economic health of downtown. So, their corporate arm acts on that interest.
So conform to beliefs outside the religion to "revitalize" an LDS community? So should a wardhouse have an open bar to help "revitalize" the attendance to get non-members there?
You're drawing a tenuous connection there, so I'm not sure how serious you are. But, I'll play along. As PKM pointed out, the church may hold the lease on the space these businesses use, but few, if any, are actually owned by the church. Would it be better if they nit picked and insisted that any business who wanted to be there had to conform to a rigid set of church rules? From a business standpoint, that would be insane. Doing so would alienate a huge portion of potential patrons, and then we'd be talking about how evil they are because they want to exclude everyone. Over the last several years, the church has gone to great lengths to try to unite with the community, rather than isolate from it.
Did he say build a mall that serves alcohol and coffee?
For the greater good? I might answer that question, Yes.