Doublea
Well-Known Member
It was a lot worse last season, and different roles and different teams. Gotta look into context.
I'd rather have Korver at the two than hayward
- Thread starter l Abach l
- Start date
It was a lot worse last season, and different roles and different teams. Gotta look into context.
BENTLEY
Well-Known Member
Yeah, Heyward drives me crazy. I'd rather have Chandler Parsons.
Not really Hayward vs Korver ...
It seems that Kanter experiment ended quickly. If the Jazz would have wanted a winning record yet developing the young guys they should have negotiated and kept a few players - namely Milsap and DMC.
What if the Jazz had a lineup of Milsap and DMC instead of JL3 and Harris? And still had Korver.
Of course they will be over the luxury tax but think of it -
Favors, Milsap, Jefferson, Hayward, Trey with the bench of Kanter, Marv, DMC, Korver, Burks then Gobert, Evans, Biedrins, and whoever to fill the roster. And female population in the ESA will also rise =)
Well this group will still be in the middle of the pack but at least have a better chance of winning while developing Favors, Trey, etc.
Of course, no chance of getting the top 3 draft pick.
It seems that Kanter experiment ended quickly. If the Jazz would have wanted a winning record yet developing the young guys they should have negotiated and kept a few players - namely Milsap and DMC.
What if the Jazz had a lineup of Milsap and DMC instead of JL3 and Harris? And still had Korver.
Of course they will be over the luxury tax but think of it -
Favors, Milsap, Jefferson, Hayward, Trey with the bench of Kanter, Marv, DMC, Korver, Burks then Gobert, Evans, Biedrins, and whoever to fill the roster. And female population in the ESA will also rise =)
Well this group will still be in the middle of the pack but at least have a better chance of winning while developing Favors, Trey, etc.
Of course, no chance of getting the top 3 draft pick.