What's new
By:

If Trump dodges debates...

Dr. Jones said:
Doesn't matter. He's louder.
Believe him. He knows loud and Hillary is not loud.
Click to expand...
If either of them ever figure out that you don't have to yell at the top of your lungs in order to make a point they might run away with this election. Listening to them scream is so annoying.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Simply unreal that anyone would say this.
Click to expand...
Unbiased statically analysis can confirm this. Of the statements she has made while running for office she has been the most truthful. More than any candidate in this election including the primaries. Trump has been historically on the other end of this. About 60 percent of the statements he has made that can be proven right or wrong have been outright lies. The rest of his statements are half lies at best.
 
Dr. Jones said:
Doesn't matter. He's louder.
Believe him. He knows loud and Hillary is not loud.
Click to expand...

Sadly, this is true and this is why he has the following he has. Doesn't matter if he's wrong or says the most ludicrous things. People want change. They don't want "politicians." They want people who are going to fight back against the system. And he sounds like he's that type. Even if reality says he's a complete and utter moron and part of that system, minus the politics. People are just too dumb to realize that or don't care and despise Hilary so much and "listen" to his empty rhetoric, even though it's just that.
 
candrew said:
If being the loudest worked then Howard Dean would have won in 04.
Click to expand...

It's not what you say but how you say it. Sure, Dean was loud but he also was too bright and democratic and one the dumb, white constituency can't relate to like they (think they) can in Trump. Even though, if they were in a room with Trump, he'd treat them like the garbage he thinks they are.
 
Broncster said:
Unbiased statically analysis can confirm this. Of the statements she has made while running for office she has been the most truthful. More than any candidate in this election including the primaries. Trump has been historically on the other end of this. About 60 percent of the statements he has made that can be proven right or wrong have been outright lies. The rest of his statements are half lies at best.
Click to expand...
Whatever you want to believe. Just make sure you don't take a look at any of the evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

Donald Trump either does not know, or is extremely careless with the truth. That does not excuse Hillary's lies.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Whatever you want to believe. Just make sure you don't take a look at any of the evidence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

Donald Trump either does not know, or is extremely careless with the truth. That does not excuse Hillary's lies.
Click to expand...

Clinton has lied, so has everyone on this planet including you and me. But it is a factual statement that she is the most honest candidate we have had in quite awhile. More honest than Trump, Bernie, any Bush or pretty much any candidate the past few elections. Labeling her as a liar above other candidates is false. I'm purely going off facts not my opinion or anyone else's. Sorry if facts disagree with what you feel.
 
Also just watched 10 sec of that video and it's pretty easy to see it is not "facts" it's a video made to make Clinton look bad. Also changing sides on issues does not make me dislike candidates. I have changed my mind on many things in my lifetime, it's called becoming educated and learning. I'll take actual facts and unbiased evidence over smear campaign videos. There are things I don't like about Clinton that doesn't mean she won't be a good president. There are things I don't like about everyone. There is no such thing as a candidate that I 100 precent agree with. No one should agree with a candidate completely otherwise you are probably giving into propaganda. The whole point of parties and choosing a leader is picking someone that you are going to compromise on the minor issues for the major ones or important ones to you.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Broncster said:
Unbiased statically analysis can confirm this. Of the statements she has made while running for office she has been the most truthful. More than any candidate in this election including the primaries. Trump has been historically on the other end of this. About 60 percent of the statements he has made that can be proven right or wrong have been outright lies. The rest of his statements are half lies at best.
Click to expand...

lol
 
Broncster said:
Do you disagree?
Click to expand...

An "unbiased statistically analysis" (as you put it) does not exist. You are gullible if you think it does.

As far as Hillary Clinton's honesty. Trump being a liar does not make her an honest person or politician. She has been caught in bold lies, she changes her positions for political expediency, and she destroyed correspondence that was subject to the freedom of information act. That's not an honest person. That's a liar, a phony, and a conspirator.
 
Broncster said:
Clinton has lied, so has everyone on this planet including you and me. But it is a factual statement that she is the most honest candidate we have had in quite awhile. More honest than Trump, Bernie, any Bush or pretty much any candidate the past few elections. Labeling her as a liar above other candidates is false. I'm purely going off facts not my opinion or anyone else's. Sorry if facts disagree with what you feel.
Click to expand...

I think perhaps in terms of her platform and what she is "promising" to do as a candidate, this might be true. Or if not true (since you can't prove something before it happens) it's at least the most plausible.

She's not saying saying she going to force Mexico to build the "Berlin Wall" along our common border and she's not saying she'll ban Muslims from entering the country like her opponent.
 
moevillini said:
I think perhaps in terms of her platform and what she is "promising" to do as a candidate, this might be true. Or if not true (since you can't prove something before it happens) it's at least the most plausible.

She's not saying saying she going to force Mexico to build the "Berlin Wall" along our common border and she's not saying she'll ban Muslims from entering the country like her opponent.
Click to expand...

How about focusing on her actions rather than what she promises as a politician. Is the Middle East in better shape now than when she was appointed Secretary of State? The evidence is pretty clear.
 
Cunning Linguist said:
Sadly, this is true and this is why he has the following he has. Doesn't matter if he's wrong or says the most ludicrous things. People want change. They don't want "politicians." They want people who are going to fight back against the system. And he sounds like he's that type. Even if reality says he's a complete and utter moron and part of that system, minus the politics. People are just too dumb to realize that or don't care and despise Hilary so much and "listen" to his empty rhetoric, even though it's just that.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure people really want change as much as they want to hear someone rant about it. And I think they like the idea of electing a bully that they imagine is going to bully everyone else, but not them.

I think they'll find the reality of a Trump presidency to be an entirely different kettle of fish than they imagine.
 
♪alt13 said:
An "unbiased statistically analysis" (as you put it) does not exist. You are gullible if you think it does.

As far as Hillary Clinton's honesty. Trump being a liar does not make her an honest person or politician. She has been caught in bold lies, she changes her positions for political expediency, and she destroyed correspondence that was subject to the freedom of information act. That's not an honest person. That's a liar, a phony, and a conspirator.
Click to expand...

First of all I am not claiming she is an honest person or even an honest politician. I am saying she has been more honest than other presidential candidates this year and in recent elections. The only objective way to judge how honest they are (to me) is by their statements they have made during their campaign. It is easy to prove if the facts they state are true or not. There are multiple independent non-biased organizations that analyze the data for their statements. I provided a few links for those but there are others.

I suppose if you think their statements dont make them honest or not then I guess it is completely arbitrary information and data. What people say is what I base their honesty over though.
 
Does anyone think that a lot of Vet groups are going to go after him over his comments on the Khans?
 
Stoked said:
Does anyone think that a lot of Vet groups are going to go after him over his comments on the Khans?
Click to expand...

I'm surprised that off all the **** he's said this seems for the moment like it's going to stick.
 
Jamezz said:
How about focusing on her actions rather than what she promises as a politician. Is the Middle East in better shape now than when she was appointed Secretary of State? The evidence is pretty clear.
Click to expand...

We can focus on her statements in the past and current statements that we can research their truthfulness. Those have a great record compared to any other candidate.There is no way to prove that the state of all of the middle eastern countries is better or worse with Clinton as secretary of state as opposed to anyone else being in that position. Pinning the problems of the middle east on Clinton is outrageous. I would rather trust someone who has an overall impressive history and resume as a leader and has mostly had success over someone like Trump who so far has 0 history and credibility as a political leader and his statements to us (the people) so far have been overwhelming proven to be lies, more than any candidate in my lifetime. Yes Clinton has made mistakes just like every leader ever has and will, but overall has a great record of making the right decision.
 
Stoked said:
Does anyone think that a lot of Vet groups are going to go after him over his comments on the Khans?
Click to expand...
Explain please
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top