What's new

Inauguration Day

Resist the urge to mock for 5 minutes guys. Try, hard.

What do you think will happen? Save the crap for another thread

Not much. Some protests, probably some isolated fights, nothing will get very close to the one guy getting sworn in.
 
you fail to see that the left has been stoking fires. previous right wing candidates took it , or went on defensive.
now that their is a candidate who fires back suddenly thats dangerous? and he gets called for stoking fires!


WAKE UP MAN!

the truth should never be an insult brother.

Uh huh, Trump just fires back. He never starts anything. Sure.
 
Uh huh, Trump just fires back. He never starts anything. Sure.

boohooo! cry harder!


crying racist, bigot, homophobe, islamophobe, xenophobe used to work when people jsut shut up and cowered because we where afraid of those terms.
now trump is just fighting back, so you call that stoking fires!!
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQuo_Tl43rY


lol tucker Carlson OWNING a punk!!! this same punk was on other news station and they forgot to vet him, fake news does not vet!!!!!!!
 
whatever happens the lame stream media will blame TRUMP!
showing that they are lying ********, alienating more of the people in the process!

whether an assassination attempt happens. or protestors getting tear gassed. media will blame trump and so called fascism. thereby lying their *** off again. because fascism is left wing.

it will be a glorious day. seeing the left and media double down on their anti diversity of thought campaign.


the left is unpredictable, i am expecting anything from an assassination attempt to a full on fist fight between bikers and snowflakes. so yeah. i for one cannot wait!!!!

It's funny when you say the left is brainwashed and you throw out your obummer, "lame stream media", barrack hussein obama, etc

I could say you are brainwashed by all the right wing nut jobs on social media and fox news. You sound exactly like them.
 
It's funny when you say the left is brainwashed and you throw out your obummer, "lame stream media", barrack hussein obama, etc

I could say you are brainwashed by all the right wing nut jobs on social media and fox news. You sound exactly like them.

maybe. but i stillw atch the lame stream media, but i also watch alex jones. even those young turkians, dailywire. breitbart.

but here is the funny thinngs. the truth is in between. so when watching everything and doing some research you find out where the truth lies!

but people who carelessly take over lame stream media narrative are either brainwashing by them, or indoctrinated.


there are certain tells to know when someone is brainwashed, for example if they bring up trump mocked a disabled person. that's a sure telltale sign that they have been brianwahsed. because 2 minutes of research disproves it. but they dont bother to do it. they just listen to the lame stream media.

whats wrong with saying barrack hussein obama. history has hown people with names like barrack and hussein are enmies of the jews. i'm a jew. i believe in statistics. he did not prove those statistics wrong yet. but he still has about 24 hours to suprise me
 
It's funny when you say the left is brainwashed and you throw out your obummer, "lame stream media", barrack hussein obama, etc

I could say you are brainwashed by all the right wing nut jobs on social media and fox news. You sound exactly like them.

Hack sounding like every manhood-lacking altright neckbearded 4chan poster. What a corny-*** dude
 
maybe. but i stillw atch the lame stream media, but i also watch alex jones. even those young turkians, dailywire. breitbart.

but here is the funny thinngs. the truth is in between. so when watching everything and doing some research you find out where the truth lies!

but people who carelessly take over lame stream media narrative are either brainwashing by them, or indoctrinated.


there are certain tells to know when someone is brainwashed, for example if they bring up trump mocked a disabled person. that's a sure telltale sign that they have been brianwahsed. because 2 minutes of research disproves it. but they dont bother to do it. they just listen to the lame stream media.

whats wrong with saying barrack hussein obama. history has hown people with names like barrack and hussein are enmies of the jews. i'm a jew. i believe in statistics. he did not prove those statistics wrong yet. but he still has about 24 hours to suprise me
There is no reason to watch ****ty and/or biased news. There is plenty of good reputable news. No reason to watch CNN or worse like fox news and Breitbart or other similar poor news. Choose good news and those poor news organizations will change or go away.
 
There is no reason to watch ****ty and/or biased news. There is plenty of good reputable news. No reason to watch CNN or worse like fox news and Breitbart or other similar poor news. Choose good news and those poor news organizations will change or go away.

ok point me to those reputable news sources please
 
ok point me to those reputable news sources please

You are confusing reputable with no bias. They ALL have bias.

From my experience your best options are sites that do all the work for you in gathering news. Like Google News and RealClear.

That way it has Huff Post, CNN, Fox, Wash Post, NBC, ABC, USA Today, LA Times, NY Times, Boston Herald, The Atlantic...even down to sites like Mother Jones, Townhall and The Federalist.

Then a good mix of foreign press like The Telegraph,, Rolling Stones, Der Spiegel, RT, Asia Times, Al-Monitor...
 
You are confusing reputable with no bias. They ALL have bias.

From my experience your best options are sites that do all the work for you in gathering news. Like Google News and RealClear.

That way it has Huff Post, CNN, Fox, Wash Post, NBC, ABC, USA Today, LA Times, NY Times, Boston Herald, The Atlantic...even down to sites like Mother Jones, Townhall and The Federalist.

Then a good mix of foreign press like The Telegraph,, Rolling Stones, Der Spiegel, RT, Asia Times, Al-Monitor...

You should have stopped when you had it right. They are all biased. Misrepresent facts on purpose, select facts to present and bury others, stuff to make you think you know when you don't.

For thinkers like Game, no, they don't meet in a cloakroom or in a basement janitorial closet to decide what is what. They share some points of a common world view, and have "chosen to believe" that they are virtuous in what they do.
 
It will cost Soros a good day's income to hire some of those protestors, and another good day's take to keep the lights on in some little pusher organizations working for the cause of rearranged seating at the table of world power.
 
These protesters represent the intellectual tradition of the fake news people who gasped when Trump said he'd have to look at the election results before he would accept them, calling him the end of representative government and a wannabe dictator, you know, the folks who then said democracy was sacred and everyone should accept the election results.
 
You are confusing reputable with no bias. They ALL have bias.

From my experience your best options are sites that do all the work for you in gathering news. Like Google News and RealClear.

That way it has Huff Post, CNN, Fox, Wash Post, NBC, ABC, USA Today, LA Times, NY Times, Boston Herald, The Atlantic...even down to sites like Mother Jones, Townhall and The Federalist.

Then a good mix of foreign press like The Telegraph,, Rolling Stones, Der Spiegel, RT, Asia Times, Al-Monitor...



i'd rather get it from all and then filter out the facts. **** their bias!
 
i'd rather get it from all and then filter out the facts. **** their bias!

If you think a news group is not good why read it then.

Also there is a big difference between a news group that has a slight bias and having an agenda. Groups with an agenda are not attempting to report news and facts they are reporting their opinions and using news stories to prove a preconceived notion they have.

ok point me to those reputable news sources please

I have posted them before and I can post more again. There are plenty of good news sources. There are lots and lots and lots and lots of journalists who attempt to tell the news and the facts and even if they have opinion they leave them out of their news because that is how news journalists are trained and many are good at their jobs. Some are not but most are.

Either way if you think a news organization is bad and reporting fake news or bad news stop reading it and look for better ones.

I think for the most part these are great news organizations with good journalists:
Lots of local news
Christian Science Monitor
factcheck.org
pew research
Reuters
The Chronical for higher education
NPR
Snopes
Al Jazeera
NY Times (opinion pages are are over the top liberal but I dont read opinion pages from news)
Wall Street Journal

Those are few that I like but there are many many many many many more. If you dont like one of those and think they are not honest or are lying then find one that has journalists that are doing their jobs correctly like most journalist do.
 
maybe. but i stillw atch the lame stream media, but i also watch alex jones. even those young turkians, dailywire. breitbart.

but here is the funny thinngs. the truth is in between. so when watching everything and doing some research you find out where the truth lies!

but people who carelessly take over lame stream media narrative are either brainwashing by them, or indoctrinated.


there are certain tells to know when someone is brainwashed, for example if they bring up trump mocked a disabled person. that's a sure telltale sign that they have been brianwahsed. because 2 minutes of research disproves it. but they dont bother to do it. they just listen to the lame stream media.

whats wrong with saying barrack hussein obama. history has hown people with names like barrack and hussein are enmies of the jews. i'm a jew. i believe in statistics. he did not prove those statistics wrong yet. but he still has about 24 hours to suprise me

Wow. The most impressive thing I took from all this garbage was that Dunce can spell the word indoctrinated correctly.
 
You should have stopped when you had it right. They are all biased. Misrepresent facts on purpose, select facts to present and bury others, stuff to make you think you know when you don't.

For thinkers like Game, no, they don't meet in a cloakroom or in a basement janitorial closet to decide what is what. They share some points of a common world view, and have "chosen to believe" that they are virtuous in what they do.

So your solution is to stay uninformed?

Yes they all have bias. Which is when I become interested in a story/even I try to read from many sources. So that I am, as well as I can, determine what is really happening.

I refuse to just disengage myself.
 
If you think a news group is not good why read it then.

Also there is a big difference between a news group that has a slight bias and having an agenda. Groups with an agenda are not attempting to report news and facts they are reporting their opinions and using news stories to prove a preconceived notion they have.



I have posted them before and I can post more again. There are plenty of good news sources. There are lots and lots and lots and lots of journalists who attempt to tell the news and the facts and even if they have opinion they leave them out of their news because that is how news journalists are trained and many are good at their jobs. Some are not but most are.

Either way if you think a news organization is bad and reporting fake news or bad news stop reading it and look for better ones.

I think for the most part these are great news organizations with good journalists:
Lots of local news
Christian Science Monitor
factcheck.org
pew research
Reuters
The Chronical for higher education
NPR
Snopes
Al Jazeera
NY Times (opinion pages are are over the top liberal but I dont read opinion pages from news)
Wall Street Journal

Those are few that I like but there are many many many many many more. If you dont like one of those and think they are not honest or are lying then find one that has journalists that are doing their jobs correctly like most journalist do.

snopes is toxic cancer. worst of the worst of the worst.

if i had access to the nuclear arsenal i would find out where snopes headquarters is and nuke it to oblivion. every single nuke will be launched upon it, thats how cancerous snope is. rest of your list has some bad ones in there too
 
So your solution is to stay uninformed?

Yes they all have bias. Which is when I become interested in a story/even I try to read from many sources. So that I am, as well as I can, determine what is really happening.

I refuse to just disengage myself.

this is actually a good point. I read anything I can get, when I have time. I read outright communist propaganda and every brand from there to satan-worshipping gurus or whatever else there is. I take point of view and bias into consideration, and ask why they are saying whatever, and why, if they do believe it, they believe it.

then I have fun wondering why I believe anything. . . .
 
Back
Top