What's new

Interesting charts of salaries of players adjusted for Win Share

So, Millsap and Al had much higher win share per 48 minutes than any of our young players (except for Evans), and Burks had much lower WS/48 than Marvin and Foye?

How could it be? Is the dominant perception of the relative value for the Jazz players completely wrong or is the win share a useless statistic?

I think the dominant perception is that there is a very good chance our young guys will get better and surpass what Al and Millsap were putting up last year... if we ever decide to play them. As for Burks, his WS/48 was quite a bit better his rookie year, when he was driving to the basket and drawing fouls instead of trying to play point guard.
 
Back
Top