What's new

Is Hayward a victim of reverse racism on this board?

Zero. Because you'd never own said hypothetical business because you're too ignorant to run your own life let alone a restaurant.

....I suspect your life is the train wreck, the dumpster fire.....probably divorced a few times, child support payments, credit cards maxed out, about to be downsized on your job. How many did I get right?
 
....I suspect your life is the train wreck, the dumpster fire.....probably divorced a few times, child support payments, credit cards maxed out, about to be downsized on your job. How many did I get right?

Zero marriages. Zero children. Zero credit card debt. I pay in full every month. I've been gainfully employed for 10 years at the same job and am going nowhere...well until education sadly privatizes. Then, I could be ****ed.
 
....I suspect your life is the train wreck, the dumpster fire.....probably divorced a few times, child support payments, credit cards maxed out, about to be downsized on your job. How many did I get right?

Zero marriages. Zero children. Zero credit card debt. I pay in full every month. I've been gainfully employed for 10 years at the same job and am going nowhere...well until education sadly privatizes. Then, I could be ****ed.

so your turn CJ.
 
From the little I read I think One Brow's point would be better served if he used the term tribalism instead of racialism that is so close to racism that is pretty much impossible to separate between the two. Not the idea behind the word but the words themselves. They're so similar it will cause a visceral reaction from ppl.

With this I'm not saying I agree with One Brow's views or those from others in this thread cause I only read about 2 pages (maybe).
 
Zero marriages. Zero children. Zero credit card debt. I pay in full every month. I've been gainfully employed for 10 years at the same job and am going nowhere...well until education sadly privatizes. Then, I could be ****ed.

.....I accept that! Thanks for your honesty!
 
so your turn CJ.

....been happily married for 25 years, no kids, no debts, same job for 20 years, gaining weight, losing hair, more cynical than ever......and I resent the fact that you could possibly imagine me with a tattoo on any part of my body....let alone my face!
 
Okay........

No, it's not racism to acknowledge the simple fact that in the NBA black athletes are physically superior to white athletes due to simple genetic economics, i.e., the breeding of slaves in the 17th-19th centuries.

Yes, that explains Serge Ibaka's freakish athleticism. The breeding of his ancestors. In the Republic of Congo. In Africa. DOH!

So if your statement is true, it would be easy to test and prove that African Americans are physically genetically superior to Africans. That proof should be fairly easy to find, so I'll be waiting for your post of the scientific study.......
 
This smacks of psuedo-science to me.

If this nonsense is correct then wouldn't it also apply to mental and emotional attributes. African americans were bred to be subservient to authority, less intelligent, less independent and less intellectually curious?

I highly doubt that a few centuries is anywhere near long enough to affect such a substantial change in the genetic makeup of a people.

Well said
 
B. The environment that African-Americans were placed into during the 17th and 18th centuries particularly in the United States also helped filter some out.

This environment was evolutionarily harsher than Africans who were struggling to survive in Africa?
 
Racism is an action, not a thought or opinion.

Is that how it is defined on planet kennykyle? Well, here on Earth that is not the definition, dictionary.com:

a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
 
....personally, I'm not hiring a guy who comes in loaded with jailhouse tats, his pants to the ground, and his cap on sideways......I don't care what race or color he is!

That you think your comments were in any way relevant to my comments is one of the reasons we know you are steeped in racial prejudices.
 
Is that how it is defined on planet kennykyle?

That's how it is used by people who stody the phenomenon. Dictionaries are great for looking at popular conceptions, less so if you want to discuss concepts in detail. Also, there is nothing in your definition to indicate it is an individual belief, as opposed to a cultural belief (that is, part of the milleu of beliefs associated with the members of a given culture).
 
One is naturally an extension of the other. I deny your attmepts to seperate the two. They go hand in hand and always will.

Naturally, cultural associations are an extension of individual associations. Naturally, you can't separate them. That does not prevent you from distinguishing them.

I expect nothing more than denial from you, though. Feel free to refuse to distinguish the two concepts. Feel free to misunderstand me when I discuss them. Feel free to think you are making some sort of contribution to the dialogue when you post based on those assumptions. You only need ot convince yourself, after all.
 
reference please, onebrow

That's how it is used by people who stody the phenomenon.

Then it should be very easy for you to provide 3 quotes from scholars of racism that state that racism is purely action, completely independent of thought or opinion....

Looking forward to your reply, onebrow, tick tock
 
Doubt this will convince onebrow...

That's how it is used by people who stody the phenomenon. Dictionaries are great for looking at popular conceptions, less so if you want to discuss concepts in detail. Also, there is nothing in your definition to indicate it is an individual belief, as opposed to a cultural belief (that is, part of the milleu of beliefs associated with the members of a given culture).

That would be a great argument if the dictionary were somehow out of step with scholars of racism, which of course is not the case.

According to the US Civil Rights Commission, Racism is any action or attitude, conscious or unconscious, that subordinates an individual or group based on skin colour or race. It can be enacted individually or institutionally.

https://www.usccr.gov

This commission includes Abigail Thernstrom, Adjunct Scholar, American Enterprise Institute, Peter N. Kirsanow, Corporate Advisor in Public Policy and California State University Trustee, Gail Heriot, Professor of Law, University of San Diego, Todd F. Gaziano, Senior Fellow in Legal Studies, The Heritage Foundation

If you want to argue that this is just political, check out their web site, the commission is a mix of independents, republicans and democrats.

If you want, you can easily find dozens of other scholars or racism who us a similar working definition, such as this one https://academic.udayton.edu/race/01race/race08.htm
 
^^^ This.

Differentiating between a racist and racism is the same as differentiating between a Mormon and Mormonism.

To waste time debating the difference, or lack there of, is stupid.
 
^^^ This.

Differentiating between a racist and racism is the same as differentiating between a Mormon and Mormonism.

......how do you tell the difference between a radical Muslim......and a non-radical Muslim? Homeland Security has spent billions and billions of dollars with no end in sight!
 
Back
Top