theNBAnerd
Well-Known Member
this tweet by brian smith is curiously specific, isn't it?
he doesn't say "the mid lottery" or "the 6-10 range"... he is specific about 8. i wondered if that is because 8 is where you start to hear that teams are shopping the pick, but that's not the case. sacto (5), porty (6 & 11), and GS (7) have all been rumored to be gauging interest in trades, so why didn't the tweet say the 5-8 range? it was oddly specific to #8, which makes me wonder: is there something tentative in place with toronto?
i looked at the raps' salary picture. they're under the cap, so we don't have to worry about trades matching dollar-for-dollar. they could take back far more salary than they gave up, and in most cases they could acquire just about any player straight across without giving up any cap-counting assets.
they clearly are not letting go of bargnani, the closest thing they have to a franchise face. i doubt they'd give up their two rookie contract guys either: ed david and derozan. bayless is entering restricted free agency. other than that they have:
* calderon - expiring contract at 10.6M
* amir johnson - inexplicably owed 19.5M over the next three, but taking on somebody like that might be a key to getting a deal done
* linas kleiza - only owed 9.2M over this year and next (assuming he opts in next year), so likely not a salary dump kind of guy
* james johnson - also on a rookie deal but probably less important to them
* gary forbes & solomon alabi - discount rack
so what would the deal be? maybe we get #8 if we give up one of our young veterans + we take back amir johnson's bad contract? that's consistent with the historical cost of moving into the top 10.
"Brian T. Smith: Whether Lillard's taken before No. 8 will likely impact any attempt made by Jazz to move up in first round of #NBA draft and select him."
he doesn't say "the mid lottery" or "the 6-10 range"... he is specific about 8. i wondered if that is because 8 is where you start to hear that teams are shopping the pick, but that's not the case. sacto (5), porty (6 & 11), and GS (7) have all been rumored to be gauging interest in trades, so why didn't the tweet say the 5-8 range? it was oddly specific to #8, which makes me wonder: is there something tentative in place with toronto?
i looked at the raps' salary picture. they're under the cap, so we don't have to worry about trades matching dollar-for-dollar. they could take back far more salary than they gave up, and in most cases they could acquire just about any player straight across without giving up any cap-counting assets.
they clearly are not letting go of bargnani, the closest thing they have to a franchise face. i doubt they'd give up their two rookie contract guys either: ed david and derozan. bayless is entering restricted free agency. other than that they have:
* calderon - expiring contract at 10.6M
* amir johnson - inexplicably owed 19.5M over the next three, but taking on somebody like that might be a key to getting a deal done
* linas kleiza - only owed 9.2M over this year and next (assuming he opts in next year), so likely not a salary dump kind of guy
* james johnson - also on a rookie deal but probably less important to them
* gary forbes & solomon alabi - discount rack
so what would the deal be? maybe we get #8 if we give up one of our young veterans + we take back amir johnson's bad contract? that's consistent with the historical cost of moving into the top 10.