I haven't chimed in on this thread yet, because I want my points to be clear and helpful. I'm not sure if now is the best time for my crack at it, but here goes.
First, thanks to those who offered their perspectives; it takes at least a modicum of balls to comment on this topic (and seemingly all others that pertain to racial "relations" in the United States). It gives me great joy to see that a dialogue is
possible, at least online with people we seem to think we feel comfortable having these conversations with us.
Moving ahead, my initial reaction to the thread included a thought along these lines: "Why not also include a demographic poll to complement the OP poll?" Maybe it's the social researcher in me, but, considering the topic in discussion, I think it would be a good idea to get a sense of who's posting on the topic, with specific interest in our racial and ethnic makeup. I can take a stab at the numbers offhand, but I bet you all can, too. So I'll skip that exercise for the sake of parsimony with my words (with which I am presently doing a ****ty job, iirc).
There were some themes that I found common among many of the posts here. It's subtle, hidden, and unwittingly insidious when it bites you on the ***. This theme pervades much of what I retrospectively interpreted from my memories of growing up in a racially homogenous environment. It's the theme of power.
In reference to "power", I certainly mean to say the
privilege that pertains to belonging to the phenotypical-majority groups in the United States (i.e., White, Christian, English-speaking, and middle-class). Power is so potent in contemporary America, that those who have it often don't know they have it. Power, much like "money," gives someone options that the person considers to be earned or deserved. Except, unlike money, the kind of power to which I refer can never be shared or donated to a good cause; it will only be passed on to progeny in the person's unconscious heredity.
However, just like with money, it is possible to change how power -- the social capital -- can be exchanged in the United States. I know it's starting to sound contrived, but I really like this metaphor. So please bear with me.
As it currently stands in the US, there are different
exchange rates among the racial and ethnic groups that represent us as a nation. If you belong to the American all-star group I referred to earlier,
"UB" said:
i.e., White, Christian, English-speaking, and middle-class
, your exchange rate is nearly 1:1. That is, you can exercise almost lossless power in society: that which you think you "deserve" to do within legal limits, you probably can. I know this, and I am most definitely speaking from an admixture of my knowledge of the literature and my own personal experiences. Being White and English-speaking will save your ***, especially if you're well-spoken, calm, and otherwise waspy (forgive my epithet...it's my own projection as a white boy who grew up Lutheran in the suburbs). There is a certain rate devaluation that occurs as the individual in-question's presentation fits less with "Caucasian/white" than with "dark-skinned/black."
If you're a white dude like me (and qh2b1, imho), understanding your privilege has been conceptualized to occur by phases of development. I'll spare you the preachy nonsense, but what I'm saying is that learning about privilege is ****ed up because it completely contradicts what the American narrative is all about: equality. I'd love to continue this dialogue. I'm pretty high atm.
Best,
-
...'Merica