What's new

Israel Commences Ground Invasion into Gaza.

Note I am in no way endorsing Hamas, or killing civilians, or terrorism in general. I am merely pointing out that Palestinians have very legitimate grievances that do not get the coverage/discussion they deserve in the US media. One, however, cannot be surprises that these grievances translated at times, particularly among the more radicalized young men (whose situation is perhaps the most dire among Palestinians) into violence. Hell, the US rebelled violently over 200 years ago under conditions that were far, far more benign than what's going on in Palestine. They were heros, yet oppressed Palestinians who rebel with violence are, de facto, terrorists? I think that they'd be damned no matter what they did--even if they targeted purely military targets or the infrastructure of the apparatus that oppresses them. We'd still consider them terrorists. I'm struggling to understand where the fine line between being a terrorist and a legit 'freedom fighter' lies. (Again, I do not approve of the form the rebellion takes when it targets civilians.)


Let me draw the line for you - fighting against fighters is legitimate; fighting against civilians is terrorism. Zionist organizations fighting against British soldiers during the British Mandate in Israel were legitimate, Zionist organizations killing British civilians in Israel during the Mandate were terrorists. American colonists killing native American warriors were legitimate, same colonists eradicating whole villages were terrorists. Palestinian rebels attacking military troops are legitimate, Palestinian rebels digging tunnels to kidnap civilians or firing rockets into major metropolis are terrorists. Hamas terrorists forcing Palestinian civilians to act as human shields are terrorists. Storing and firing rockets from UN schools in Gaza while disregarding the results is terrorism.

Targeting civilians in the name of killing as many as you can because it is safer than fighting the opposing fighters is terrorism. There is no explanation whatsoever that can justify purposely killing civilians.

In a war, especially when it is being engaged in a densely populated areas, some civilians will get killed. Any measure should be taken to prevent that, and I can testify first hand that Israel does that with phone calls, sms, mail, pamphlets and additional announcements in advance. I do not believe that it is a common practice to declare what and when you are planning you attack in advance, risking your own troops.
 
Let me draw the line for you - fighting against fighters is legitimate; fighting against civilians is terrorism. Zionist organizations fighting against British soldiers during the British Mandate in Israel were legitimate, Zionist organizations killing British civilians in Israel during the Mandate were terrorists. American colonists killing native American warriors were legitimate, same colonists eradicating whole villages were terrorists. Palestinian rebels attacking military troops are legitimate, Palestinian rebels digging tunnels to kidnap civilians or firing rockets into major metropolis are terrorists. Hamas terrorists forcing Palestinian civilians to act as human shields are terrorists. Storing and firing rockets from UN schools in Gaza while disregarding the results is terrorism.

Targeting civilians in the name of killing as many as you can because it is safer than fighting the opposing fighters is terrorism. There is no explanation whatsoever that can justify purposely killing civilians.

In a war, especially when it is being engaged in a densely populated areas, some civilians will get killed. Any measure should be taken to prevent that, and I can testify first hand that Israel does that with phone calls, sms, mail, pamphlets and additional announcements in advance. I do not believe that it is a common practice to declare what and when you are planning you attack in advance, risking your own troops.

So then Israeli bombing of civilians, as it is doing in Gaza, is terrorism?

US bombing of civilian targets in WWII and Vietnam was terrorism?

The bombing of the US Marine barracks in Nairobi wasn't terrorism?

The attack on the USS Cole years ago wasn't terrorism?

You've overlooked my other point; Palestinians could assail purely military or strategic targets, and the dominant narrative would still call them terrorists. They are in a no-win situation. Whatever response they make will be labeled terrorism by the West, while whatever Israel does will be labeled legitimate self defense. Do you really think this wouldn't be the case? (I am referring to the dominant narrative and not ruling out contrary views.)
 
So then Israeli bombing of civilians, as it is doing in Gaza, is terrorism?
Again, check you facts and realize that civilians got hurt because Hamas is using civilians as human shields. Israel warned two days in advance, and had to strike as those places are being used as rocket storage and launching facilities. Some of those places contains entrances to underground tunnels ending in nearby Israeli towns, inside Israeli territory.

US bombing of civilian targets in WWII and Vietnam was terrorism?
I don't have the facts so I can't claim if it is or isn't.

The bombing of the US Marine barracks in Nairobi wasn't terrorism? The attack on the USS Cole years ago wasn't terrorism?
No, I can't define those as terrorism. Part of being in the army is the threat of being a legitimate target. When I was in the army, I considered myself a legitimate target to the other side.

You've overlooked my other point; Palestinians could assail purely military or strategic targets, and the dominant narrative would still call them terrorists. They are in a no-win situation. Whatever response they make will be labeled terrorism by the West, while whatever Israel does will be labeled legitimate self defense. Do you really think this wouldn't be the case? (I am referring to the dominant narrative and not ruling out contrary views.)

First, you have a huge mistake thinking I can answer in behalf of the Western world. You will have to ask it yourself to get you answer.

Second, the human cognitive nature is to make generalizations. This is the way our brain works. We define one thing as such until a critical mass of information tilts it away and then we define it differently. Israel is labeled as defensive because most of the time it is. The Palestinians are labeled as terrorists because they didn't prove enough otherwise. We do it all the time - do you consider Russia to be governed in an undemocratic way, having Putin and Medvedev changing roles with each other? are they or you are still thinking about the USSR? Do you consider France as a liberal country because it is still so ore because of the french revolution? Do you consider the Jazz as a PnR team because it is or because it used to be?

We can go forever and reach nowhere. The point is that labeling is stupid and a waste of energy. Each case should be considered by current and relevant facts, not narratives, myths and wishful thinking.

Does Israel striking civilians is considered terrorism? No, there is only so much you can do to defend the other side's civilians while accomplishing your mission - which is, by the way, to stop rockets launching that is not accurate enough to be aimed at military or strategic targets, and hit mainly civilians. today, for example, a house in central Israel, 78km from Gaza, Suffered a direct hit by a rocket. Does firing rockets aimlessly in order to strike whatever is possible considered terrorism? yes it does. And it makes me sad that only if more Israeli civilians will get killed, you will understand it. But Israel was wise to develop revolutionary anti rockets system in advance, saving hundreds of lives, including those of Palestinians living in Israel and the West Bank.
 
So, to put this in another context, say YOU own some land. Someone, without permission, builds a house on YOUR land. But to show their 'good faith,' they agree to limit further theft of YOUR land to expanding their existing house but not to build additional houses, and also agree to exchange other land to appease you. Are YOU happy with this? Do YOU think this is just?

How the hell is negotiating a deal with someone who steals from you to keep him from stealing more in any way an acceptable thing?

well if you fight you fight. you fight and except everything that comes with fighting.

or you do the christian thing and turn the other cheeck.

hamas and some palestinaians chose fighting.
this is the price of fighting
 
I totally understand your claim, and can actually agree with it. But, as I said before - reality is much more complex than that. I'm not asking you to imagine anything, just bringing facts to the table. A rational response to the case you presented should not include targeting civilians in purpose of targeting civilians.
One might ask what is the goal you are trying to achieve when you blow up dozens of buses and restaurants in heartland Israel? are you trying to signal you do not approve of settlements? I can somehow understand terror attacks against settlements. I can't and wouldn't understand killing 29 kids waiting in line to enter a dance club.

So sure, If I was a Palestinian I would have been angry as hell. Would I go slain civilians to express it? HELL NO!

Let me draw the line for you - fighting against fighters is legitimate; fighting against civilians is terrorism. Zionist organizations fighting against British soldiers during the British Mandate in Israel were legitimate, Zionist organizations killing British civilians in Israel during the Mandate were terrorists. American colonists killing native American warriors were legitimate, same colonists eradicating whole villages were terrorists. Palestinian rebels attacking military troops are legitimate, Palestinian rebels digging tunnels to kidnap civilians or firing rockets into major metropolis are terrorists. Hamas terrorists forcing Palestinian civilians to act as human shields are terrorists. Storing and firing rockets from UN schools in Gaza while disregarding the results is terrorism.

Targeting civilians in the name of killing as many as you can because it is safer than fighting the opposing fighters is terrorism. There is no explanation whatsoever that can justify purposely killing civilians.

In a war, especially when it is being engaged in a densely populated areas, some civilians will get killed. Any measure should be taken to prevent that, and I can testify first hand that Israel does that with phone calls, sms, mail, pamphlets and additional announcements in advance. I do not believe that it is a common practice to declare what and when you are planning you attack in advance, risking your own troops.

I like the way you bring a new perspective to the debate and you certainly have valid points. Especially about the Hamas. However, aren't you shading the state terrorism of Israel?

Since September 29, 2000:

** 131 Israeli children have been killed by Palestinians and 1,661 Palestinian children have been killed by Israelis.

** 1,134 Israelis and at least 7,428 Palestinians have been killed.

** 8,600 Israelis and 59,737 Palestinians have been injured.

** Zero or very few Israelis are possibly being held prisoner by Palestinians, while more than 6,000 Palestinians are currently imprisoned by Israel.


Similar death numbers more or less in a chart.

cAuCT2F.png


These numbers also do not include the sizable number of Palestinians who died as a result of inability to reach medical care due to Israeli road closures, curfews, the Israeli closure of border crossing from Gaza, etc.

“The majority of these [Palestinian] children were killed and injured while going about normal daily activities, such as going to school, playing, shopping, or simply being in their homes. Sixty-four percent of children killed during the first six months of 2003 died as a result of Israeli air and ground attacks, or from indiscriminate fire from Israeli soldiers.”

Catherine Cook


I also have my sympathies for the Israeli people who have to live under the fear of Hamas, I was truly sad to read the story of you in the scary moments thread. But living under the fear of the IDF in your own territory, not even counting the times that IDF goes berserk like these days, must be a true hell as well. Besides the IDF, not to mention that, many many settlers who in the West Bank are heavily armed and there have been numerous reports of their brutal attacks on their Palestinian neighbors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1s3Qt-Tm5I

(activate the captions for English subtitles)

You can watch the rest of the video on youtube. Basically the Israeli soldier pats on the shoulder of his fellowman and threatens to arrest the home owner for provocation, which in his eyes, is nothing but only having your flag on the roof of your own home in your own lands.

Btw, I know the idiot in the video doesn't represent the Israelis but seeing how the IDF and the crowd around stand by their fellow countryman in a trespassing attempt, I can't even imagine me and my family living in such environment. It must be a non-stop fear on you for your family and home.

But nevertheless, although I truly feel sorry for all the sufferers of the conflict, my main grievance within the all Israel-Palestine case, is the unconscionable double standards, hypocrisy, and terrifyingly lopsided and unproportional view of the rest of the world about Palestine, especially the situation of the media in the states.
 
I'm not near a computer now, typing on my phone. You deserve a serious and thoughtful reply which I can't type on a screen... I will reply tomorrow. I will add that I appreciate this conversation and its' participants for being reasonable.
 
Note I am in no way endorsing Hamas, or killing civilians, or terrorism in general. I am merely pointing out that Palestinians have very legitimate grievances that do not get the coverage/discussion they deserve in the US media. One, however, cannot be surprises that these grievances translated at times, particularly among the more radicalized young men (whose situation is perhaps the most dire among Palestinians) into violence. Hell, the US rebelled violently over 200 years ago under conditions that were far, far more benign than what's going on in Palestine. They were heros, yet oppressed Palestinians who rebel with violence are, de facto, terrorists? I think that they'd be damned no matter what they did--even if they targeted purely military targets or the infrastructure of the apparatus that oppresses them. We'd still consider them terrorists. I'm struggling to understand where the fine line between being a terrorist and a legit 'freedom fighter' lies. (Again, I do not approve of the form the rebellion takes when it targets civilians.)

Ethos

John Locke vs religious extremism

Even if the American founding fathers did not live up to the ethos that they had championed(we're lookin at you Thomas)they did aspire for something inherently just and equitable. This is something we cannot say about Hamas.
 
Ethos

John Locke vs religious extremism

Even if the American founding fathers did not live up to the ethos that they had championed(we're lookin at you Thomas)they did aspire for something inherently just and equitable. This is something we cannot say about Hamas.

I think (hope) I've made it clear that I am not a Hamas supporter. But back to one of my main points, there is literally nothing the Palestinians could do as a people in terms of any kind of military/armed response to what they very legitimately view as systematized oppression that would not produce generalized condemnation in the US and them being labeled as terrorists.

The very biased lens through which our society views the Israeli-Palestinian conflict simply does not allow us, as a people, to view this in any other way.
 
From what I've read, I disagree that Israel is refraining from hitting civilian targets or that they do only because Hamas is using civilians as shields.

I understand well how generalizations and labeling work.

And THAT is at the root of the problem here in the US in terms of trying to see this conflict in an objective light. We have generalized/labeled Palestinians as terrorists and aggressors and Israel as otherwise peaceful lovers of Democracy who are merely defending themselves from the evil terrorists/aggressors.

The truth is more complex than this, but in our knee jerk rush to justify everything Israel does, we (generally speaking) have interest in hearing it.
 
I think (hope) I've made it clear that I am not a Hamas supporter. But back to one of my main points, there is literally nothing the Palestinians could do as a people in terms of any kind of military/armed response to what they very legitimately view as systematized oppression that would not produce generalized condemnation in the US and them being labeled as terrorists.

The very biased lens through which our society views the Israeli-Palestinian conflict simply does not allow us, as a people, to view this in any other way.

I agree with you to quite a large extent. I have myself in this thread pointed out Israeli hypocrisy. You asked the difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist. I feel I provided a fairly decent definition.

Do I think Israel is an apartheid state? yes
Do I think Hamas are freedom fighters? no
 
Ha ha ha ha, ha ha . . . wait, you're serious?

Christians as a whole can be accused of many things, but turning the other cheek as a general rule is not one of them.

I've seen it all the time. I've also seen it not done all the time.
 
I've seen it all the time. I've also seen it not done all the time.

Individually, yes it does happen. Collectively over time, from where I sit the evidence isn't good.

Certainly no basis to suggest, as DutchJazzer seems to, that turning the cheek is a distinguishing characteristic of Christians.
 
Ha ha ha ha, ha ha . . . wait, you're serious?

Christians as a whole can be accused of many things, but turning the other cheek as a general rule is not one of them.

yes serious just syaing if you pick a fight. you will get punched. usually if you turn the other cheeck you do not get punched as often.
 
Individually, yes it does happen. Collectively over time, from where I sit the evidence isn't good.

Certainly no basis to suggest, as DutchJazzer seems to, that turning the cheek is a distinguishing characteristic of Christians.

wheter in reality christians do it or not. it is a christian thing to do according to the bible if i am not mistaken.
 
wheter in reality christians do it or not. it is a christian thing to do according to the bible if i am not mistaken.

This is in the Bible too, is this a Christian thing to do as well?

If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property
Exodus 21:20-21
 
This is in the Bible too, is this a Christian thing to do as well?

If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property
Exodus 21:20-21
if its in the christian bible, then it is the crhistian thing to do.
 
Hamas scores victory.
FAA.

after legalizing sexual assualt on airports. faa took it on step further and help hamas score a small victory.


FAA should be BANNED!
 
Back
Top