What's new
By:

Jabari Parker

Jazz wouldn't touch Parker with a 40 ft pole given his defensive aptitude and overall oblivious attitude to his own suckiness
 
This offseason I could see a make good minimum deal for him. I think we'd have more interest if his 37-38% 3 pt shooting hadn't plummeted to 29% this year.

The Bulls experience may be the humbling experience he needs to change parts of his game and attitude. I think he could play decent/adequate defense and there are aspects of his game that are intriguing.
 
Can't believe we are still talking about this. Sign him only if he could be had at 3mil or less. Or else why bothered. Should've just resigned Hood.
 
It's amazing Parker is still only 23.

I wouldn't trade for the guy. Let Chicago buy him out first. Or if the Knicks trade for him that's fine; they can further lower his value.

If he was a UFA and we could sign him on a good contract that's relatively low-risk I'd be fine with it.

Note: I'm a former Jabari homer. But I still think he could be a contributor and fill our stretch-four need.
 
18 points (7-10) in 17 minutes last night. Leading scorer with close to half the time played as the starters.
 
WCJ out for likely the season and with RoLo being shopped/probably going to be a buy out target you're going to get a good hard look at Parker. Downside is that if he plays out of his mind then the Bulls probably just pick up his option for next year.
 
I actually think if Favors is sent for OPj that it makes it more likely the Jazz look at Parker (for depth at the 4, alone [as a potential signing, not a trade target]).
 
NUMBERICA said:
I actually think if Favors is sent for OPj that it makes it more likely the Jazz look at Parker (for depth at the 4, alone [as a potential signing, not a trade target]).
Click to expand...
Interesting thought.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I actually think if Favors is sent for OPj that it makes it more likely the Jazz look at Parker (for depth at the 4, alone [as a potential signing, not a trade target]).
Click to expand...
You think Parker could be had at the MLE? Would the Jazz have to not re-sign Rubio to keep undet the tax?
 
Jack Strop said:
You think Parker could be had at the MLE? Would the Jazz have to not re-sign Rubio to keep undet the tax?
Click to expand...
Hard to say what Parker's value is after all the bull ****. I think there's a possibility he's waived after the trade deadline if he's not traded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top