Gyp Rosetti
Banned
Please be ****ing Bell.
We'd be awful at the 3 then of course without Howard or Miles but whatever. They're not in our long term plans anyway.
Maybe a Barea for Harris swap?
Jazz in a 3 team deal?
- Thread starter BYE
- Start date
Please be ****ing Bell.
We'd be awful at the 3 then of course without Howard or Miles but whatever. They're not in our long term plans anyway.
Maybe a Barea for Harris swap?
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
While I don't hate the trade. It solves none of our problems. We still have Bell. Favors and Kanter still get too little playing time and it does not make the team any better overall. If it gets us a 1st round pick then hell yea.
Roughy half of $5.9mm prorated to a 66 game season, so not much. But we're a small market so recycling empty aluminum beer bottles left by fans is in play.
Can we let them draft it for us too? SAS are the best drafters in the league, IMO.
dipship31
Well-Known Member
Addition by subtraction regarding CJ. Tinsley has been an okay 3rd PG and Howard has been alright in spots, but this frees up a lot of time for Burks and Hayward and Danny Green is a nice piece IMO. I mostly want the trade to go down just to be excited for a shake up.
LunaticWolf
Well-Known Member
Has to be something traded between Minnesota and San Antonio. Maybe Beasley and RJefferson?
It may not solve but at least addresses some of our problems. Namely 3pt% and PT for Burks. Yes on the Kanter/favors issue and the better overall remains to be seen.
Sneakers
Well-Known Member
Im sure Sap or Jefferson will be dealt draft day... or leading up to draft. Jazz are gonna target a young PG specifically and (potentially being) without the GS pick we gotta keep our leverage until then.
JJ Rage
Active Member
It slightly mends the shooting problem going forward. The log jam at the 4/5 spots and Bell are problems we unfortunately may have to put up with until next year's deadline, when Al and Raja are expiring.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Let me correct that for you. The Jazz will definitely NOT re-up Miles. Seriously, how can a player supposedly in his prime have FG% and 3PT%'s DECLINE for 5 consecutive years?
Makes sense for Minnesota to get Tinsley. There was also talk of them wanting to swing a Ridnour for Crawford deal, but the Rubio injury put a stop to that. Perhaps if they get Tinsley, they'll go ahead with that trade. SA gets a decent back-up for another run at a title.
And I wouldn't worry about the trade not "working" on the trade checker. There are always throw-ins to make numbers match.
Hopefully picks come our way. I can't imagine the deal just being for those two players mentioned.
Last edited:
This is the type of trade that would explain that DeMarre Carroll signing. Wouldn't surprise me if this is one of the deals on the table.
It's a so-so trade. Shouldn't be a super high priority for any of the teams. It's probably just sitting there in case something better doesn't happen.
It's a so-so trade. Shouldn't be a super high priority for any of the teams. It's probably just sitting there in case something better doesn't happen.
Twin Towers
Well-Known Member
Harris - Watson - Dleague
Bell - Burks - Ellington - Green
Hayward - Evans
Millsap - Favors
Jefferson - Kanter
Too many SG's. There has to be another trade in the works if this rumor is true.
Bell - Burks - Ellington - Green
Hayward - Evans
Millsap - Favors
Jefferson - Kanter
Too many SG's. There has to be another trade in the works if this rumor is true.
JJ Rage
Active Member
I'm holding out hope Raja is part of this trade as well. However, Ellington and Green are combo 2/3 guys I believe. I don't think the Jazz would be giving up CJ AND Howard without expecting the two new guys to play a little 3 from time to time.
Also, you're forgetting Carroll.
NotDeadYet
Well-Known Member
So we trade Howard, a SF, and CJ, who plays either SF or SG, for 2 SG's? Don't compute, unless we're gonna run n' gun with 3 G's, and it sure doesn't get Burks more PT at SG...
Gyp Rosetti
Banned
Can Green play some 3? He's listed as G-F on nba.com. He also has the same standing reach as Hayward but a 2.25 inch better wingspan that Gordon.
Darkwing Duck
Well-Known Member
Nothin's real until the great almighty Locke acknowledges a rumor.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
Would MUCH rather ship Bell than Howard. However, I feel that we might be able to pry the Spurs' 1st rounder away from them, if we give em Howard. I guess we will find out soon enough what goes on. I will miss Tinsley the most out of the three though; such a kind, encouraging presence on the bench. Kanter said that he was his main tutor. Wish we could hang onto him and ship Bell instead, but life isn't always kind I suppose.
JJ Rage
Active Member
The Millers sign his checks. I consider his acknowledgement of the trade to be significant. He's certainly one of the first to issue flat out denials when the press reports someone is being shopped.
Chargers Jazz Angels
Well-Known Member
To make this trade plausible 2 things have to happen.
1st the wolves have to add 1 more player Anthony tolliver fits that bill or Anthony Randolph.
2nd the spurs have to also add a player and James Anderson seems to be the choice according to salaries.
That means the jazz ship out 3 players and take 4 back. All wing players except tolliver. Not a great deal.
Green played sf in collage and I liked him coming out. Ellington has been a huge disappointment. Anderson has been rumored to be traded for a while now.
1st the wolves have to add 1 more player Anthony tolliver fits that bill or Anthony Randolph.
2nd the spurs have to also add a player and James Anderson seems to be the choice according to salaries.
That means the jazz ship out 3 players and take 4 back. All wing players except tolliver. Not a great deal.
Green played sf in collage and I liked him coming out. Ellington has been a huge disappointment. Anderson has been rumored to be traded for a while now.