What's new
By:

Jazz sending a message

Mission Accomplished

Mission Accomplished

Well-Known Member
Kanter and Burks play a bench role because they are inconsistent. Hayward and Favors equally as inconsistent yet their roles are untouched. The message is we have lumped all of our eggs into these Hayward and Favors development bumps in the road be damed. This is the hypocrisy that we have it is the same as all of the other missteps we continue to make like the Deron and Boozer era or the Big Al and Milsap debacle. We develop only certain players then when we realize they aren't the bees knees then we have to move on.


Welcome back on the tank those common sense Jazz fans.
 
They are young and young means inconsistent. Most of them (except hayward) are below average in the career total minutes, which means inconsistent.
 
Doublea said:
They are young and young means inconsistent. Most of them (except hayward) are below average in the career total minutes, which means inconsistent.
Click to expand...

Kanter and Burks have no right to be inconsistent, they have to earn playing time over players like Marvin Williams, Richard Jefferson or even Jeremy evans.
 
CAKAR said:
Kanter and Burks have no right to be inconsistent, they have to earn playing time over players like Marvin Williams, Richard Jefferson or even Jeremy evans.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately some weird things can happen only with the Jazz. Every year there are some average players that steal minutes from the young talents.
 
Last edited:
Diamond77 said:
Unfortunately some weirds things can happen only with the Jazz. Every year there are some average players that steal minutes from the young talents.
Click to expand...

Corbin feels so much love about maturity, that it makes me think about a young 15 year old Tyrone Corbin in the 70s watching Milf-Porn hard.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Kanter and Burks play a bench role because they are inconsistent. Hayward and Favors equally as inconsistent yet their roles are untouched. The message is we have lumped all of our eggs into these Hayward and Favors development bumps in the road be damed. This is the hypocrisy that we have it is the same as all of the other missteps we continue to make like the Deron and Boozer era or the Big Al and Milsap debacle. We develop only certain players then when we realize they aren't the bees knees then we have to move on.


Welcome back on the tank those common sense Jazz fans.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but saying Favors has been as inconsistent as the rest is a joke. He has maybe be 3 "bad" games in the last 20 games. And by bad, he was 3-8, 4-8, and 3-7 shooting. The guy isn't an allstar yet, but he's been pretty good lately.
 
sgjazzfan said:
Sorry, but saying Favors has been as inconsistent as the rest is a joke. He has maybe be 3 "bad" games in the last 20 games. And by bad, he was 3-8, 4-8, and 3-7 shooting. The guy isn't an allstar yet, but he's been pretty good lately.
Click to expand...

If that is him consistent then I would take an inconsistent Kanter anytime over him. He is less the whelming.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Kanter and Burks play a bench role because they are inconsistent. Hayward and Favors equally as inconsistent yet their roles are untouched. The message is we have lumped all of our eggs into these Hayward and Favors development bumps in the road be damed. This is the hypocrisy that we have it is the same as all of the other missteps we continue to make like the Deron and Boozer era or the Big Al and Milsap debacle. We develop only certain players then when we realize they aren't the bees knees then we have to move on.


Welcome back on the tank those common sense Jazz fans.
Click to expand...

I don't care about any of the **** you're saying, but I wanted to point out that Favors hasn't been inconsistent.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Kanter and Burks play a bench role because they are inconsistent. Hayward and Favors equally as inconsistent yet their roles are untouched. The message is we have lumped all of our eggs into these Hayward and Favors development bumps in the road be damed. This is the hypocrisy that we have it is the same as all of the other missteps we continue to make like the Deron and Boozer era or the Big Al and Milsap debacle. We develop only certain players then when we realize they aren't the bees knees then we have to move on.


Welcome back on the tank those common sense Jazz fans.
Click to expand...

I do not think that word means what you think it means. /Princess Bride

Seriously, hypocrisy is not the word you want. It's only hypocrisy if the Jazz are saying one thing and doing another. In this case, the Jazz are not saying that Hayward and Burks have equal talent and are being treated equally. Or if they are, I've missed it somehow. Same thing with Favors and Kanter.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Kanter and Burks play a bench role because they are inconsistent. Hayward and Favors equally as inconsistent yet their roles are untouched. The message is we have lumped all of our eggs into these Hayward and Favors development bumps in the road be damed. This is the hypocrisy that we have it is the same as all of the other missteps we continue to make like the Deron and Boozer era or the Big Al and Milsap debacle. We develop only certain players then when we realize they aren't the bees knees then we have to move on.


Welcome back on the tank those common sense Jazz fans.
Click to expand...

If you can't see that Hayward and Favors are much farther along in there development and complete game than Burks and Kanter are right now then I don't know what your watching. There is a reason that both Hayward and Favors are on the best under 25 list and Kanter and Burks aren't. Its not just the Jazz coaching staff that is seeing that way.

Now I'm not saying that Kanter won't end up being better than both of them. But he isn't there right now and has a long way to go. Burks well never get there (and I really like Burks)
 
b_line said:
You must be very dumb. Favors has been very solid this year. He is right on track to be a good piece for our future.
Click to expand...

Take him compared with his peers Cousins eats Favors lunch any day of the week. If he is what you want as a solid player. Then maybe I should lower my expectations. Because today the top three lotto players which are young would be the best player on our team right now and they are in college.
 
Ben10 said:
If you can't see that Hayward and Favors are much farther along in there development and complete game than Burks and Kanter are right now then I don't know what your watching. There is a reason that both Hayward and Favors are on the best under 25 list and Kanter and Burks aren't. Its not just the Jazz coaching staff that is seeing that way.

Now I'm not saying that Kanter won't end up being better than both of them. But he isn't there right now and has a long way to go. Burks well never get there (and I really like Burks)
Click to expand...

They both have a year less on the team hence the need for more development.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
If that is him consistent then I would take an inconsistent Kanter anytime over him. He is less the whelming.
Click to expand...

Dude, do yourself a favor (no pun intended) and look up the word consistent. I didn't even say I would take him over Kanter (although I think I would right now), I just said he has been consistent.
 
colton said:
I do not think that word means what you think it means. /Princess Bride

Seriously, hypocrisy is not the word you want. It's only hypocrisy if the Jazz are saying one thing and doing another. In this case, the Jazz are not saying that Hayward and Burks have equal talent and are being treated equally. Or if they are, I've missed it somehow. Same thing with Favors and Kanter.
Click to expand...

Maybe you are right but this fools gold has been sold over and over. Giving the keys to two players like Boozer and Deron while the rest of the team rots in their development ala AK.
 
Mission Accomplished said:
Take him compared with his peers Cousins eats Favors lunch any day of the week. If he is what you want as a solid player. Then maybe I should lower my expectations. Because today the top three lotto players which are young would be the best player on our team right now and they are in college.
Click to expand...

Guess you didn't see the game the other night in Sacramento. No pun intended but you really should get the facts straight before you post. You sound like you haven't watched a game at all this year and are basing opinions through a blind eye.
 
themanknownassting said:
Guess you didn't see the game the other night in Sacramento. No pun intended but you really should get the facts straight before you post. You sound like you haven't watched a game at all this year and are basing opinions through a blind eye.
Click to expand...

It's called trolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top