You could say that but clearly Jokic improved due to fitness while you cannot say the same for fatter Shaq.You can say the same thing about guys like Jokic when they lost weight then
You could say that but clearly Jokic improved due to fitness while you cannot say the same for fatter Shaq.You can say the same thing about guys like Jokic when they lost weight then
Yes you can. Shaq ability to move at his weight is what made him dominant. It shortened his career, but made him betterYou could say that but clearly Jokic improved due to fitness while you cannot say the same for fatter Shaq.
I really don't think you know what your talking about, respectivelyMomentum.
I really don't think you know what your talking about, respectively
Well I hope you didnt engineer anything we have to use.I’m an engineer who studied a lot of physics. But if you say so.
Yes you can. Shaq ability to move at his weight is what made him dominant. It shortened his career, but made him better
His ability to express strength is his ability to move at his body size when coming into contact with other players (also your ability to resist forces that others put on you). There other factors as well, your center of gravity/limb length/weight distribution/fiber types/cardiovascular endurance/etc.His ability to move was due to ..... fat? Or was his ability to move fat with amazing musculature the reason for his strength? This is an IQ test.
The notion that it was his fat and not huge muscle mass that made Shaq move is the worst take I’ve seen on JazzFanz. He had 7.5% body fat in Orlando and you want us to believe that after adding fat he became stronger.
We can test your hypothesis. Shaq was 345, 365, and 395 during his first through third championship year, so we should see his stats improving each year.