What's new
By:

Jimmer for CJ?

Mongoose said:
Wow those are incredible numbers for a rookie that is 4 years older than anyone else in his draft class. They better extend that contract quick. No reason to get all testy about your jimmer- I have my opinion dumb@$$
Click to expand...
Yes you do. And it's wrong, wrong, wrong. But at least you didn't make a tool out of yourself in the process, right?!
 
I think Jimmer could be good for this team, and I do believe that Sacramento undervalues him.
 
TroutBum said:
Yes you do. And it's wrong, wrong, wrong. But at least you didn't make a tool out of yourself in the process, right?!
Click to expand...

Geeze that's twice now.... I can't post my opinion without being called some sort of name here. This is ridiculous! There must just be too many BYU fans on this board. Way to put the "tool" in missionary tool, trout literaly.
 
Mongoose said:
Geeze that's twice now.... I can't post my opinion without being called some sort of name here. This is ridiculous! There must just be too many BYU fans on this board. Way to put the "tool" in missionary tool, trout literaly.
Click to expand...

Your last sentence made no sense. Way to go.
 
Qman said:
We'll just have to disagree- I think Jimmer is a capable passer but gets very few opportunities with the ball on this Kings team. He can handle the ball as well. He is at an athletic disadvantage and will never be a very good NBA defender. Which means he must become on of the smartest, most crafty players in the league.

Food for thought:

Steve Nash averaged 3.3 ppg, 2.1 apg in 10 mpg as a rookie. He was 22 years old. He shot 42% from the field.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/n/nashst01.html

Not saying that Jimmer will be the next Steve Nash- but it can take more time for less athletic players to adjust their game.
Click to expand...

Bwahahahahaha!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top