What's new

Jimmy Butler 2 part Trade Idea

I just posted this on Chicago's Real Gm Forum and will be interested to see what they say:

"Jazz fan here: Rodney Hood, Alec Burks, Trey Burke, GSW 17' pick in a good draft, 18' Okc pick
For
Jimmy Butler

Why for Jazz : get eastern all star wing
Why for Bulls: get a up and coming wing starter Hood, 6th man stud Burks on great contract, back up PG, and 2 firsts.

What about #2 pick straight up you might ask? I personally don't think #2 is near the value of what Rodney Hood already is, let alone a starter/6th Man in Alec Burks. Then when you add a great back up PG and two picks I don't think you can do much better for a star who is disgruntled.

Consider the last 6-7 #2 picks:

Russell
Jabari
Olidipo
Derrick Williams
Kidd Gilchrist
Evan Turner
Thabbeet

#2 doesn't usually turn out to be KD. Despite the similarities he is more likely to be Marvin Williams (#2 as well) than the next KD. Ingram looks like KD but that is likely where the comparisons end. Jazz give you at a minimum the next Kris Middleton in Rodney Hood, a potential 6th man of the year candidate, a good and developing back up PG, and 2 future picks.

You will likely ask for #12 this year, but I question if the jazz would even offer one of the two that I am throwing in in this package.

Thoughts.

Is it fair value?"


Honestly, I think it is a huge haul for Chicago, and I really don't believe we need to give up both picks to get the deal done. Chicago is said to be seeking a starting wing, a rotation player, and picks.... well this deal meets all of those criteria and they get a great player in Rodney.

My next step is to look at if the Jazz would then want to flip Butler to LAL for #2 and Julius Randle. The Chicago forum is listing this as a possibility, and I think LAL would be willing to do #2 and Randle but not #2 and Russell. That said I think our deal is better for them.

As far as Randle, I would try to flip him to Sacramento in this draft for #8. At #8 and #12 we could do a combination of 2 of the following: Wade Baldwin, H Ellenson, M Criss, Luwawu, Richardson etc. My preference is W Baldwin & Ellensen.

This trade would give us the upside of what Ingram (#2) we seek, but we get to keep Gordon. I think long term it would give us the upside we need, it resets the contract situation better for the team going forward by giving us 4 more years before we need to worry about an extension for Ingram, whereas Hood is a year away etc. Plus I think Butler has some baggage that might not mesh well with at least Gordon, and I would feel better about a future with Ingram being our star, but still allow for Hayward and Favors and Rudy to carry the team while Exum and Ingram slowly take over.

THoughts.
 
Last edited:
Interesting idea. Probably pretty fair trade on paper.
I feel like we are giving up too much though. But I'm a jazz fan so I probably value our guys too much. (I think hood and Burks both have the talent to be all stars on the right team in the right role).

I think that should be enough to get the bulls to do it.
 
Butler's contract is pretty awesome. He is under contract for the next 4 seasons all of them under 20 million dollars.

I think this fact makes me do the trade.
 
Last edited:
Butler is 26 (right in his prime) and has been an all star 2 years in a row.

Then I look at his numbers. Butler has a little bit better rebounding, assist, and scoring numbers than hayward. Also a little bit better block and steal numbers.
Butler gets to the line a bit more and shoots a better free throw percentage than hayward.
Butler shoots a better field goal percentage than hayward.
And I think butler is probably the better defender than hayward too.
Butler is basically statistically a little better than Hayward in every facet of the game and would be on a better contract than hayward is going to be on with his next deal.
The one alarming thing is butler's three point percentage. 31% last year and 32% for his career. He has had 2 years shooting 38% from three though. (Hayward isn't tons better at 35% last year and 36% for his career)

I would hate to get worse at the three point line (hood and Burks are both better three point shooters than butler) but I still think I would probably do this trade.

Exum
Hayward
Butler
Favors
Gobert

That is a really really big and good defensive lineup. Probably the best defense in the league...... That can't shoot worth a **** and that's what scares me.

This trade would be a big risk and I keep bouncing back and forth on it (probably means it's a pretty fair trade) but ultimately feel like we need to cash in some assets at some point for something good that is win now.
 
That package is garbage for Butler. Add in Exum, 3 more first rounders. Lord Almighty why u disgrace Jazz fans w this? Do not make us look bad!
 
That package is garbage for Butler. Add in Exum, 3 more first rounders. Lord Almighty why u disgrace Jazz fans w this? Do not make us look bad!
I'm sorry, what? Are you saying Exum, Hood, Burks, Burke, and 5 first round picks? For Butler?
 
That package is garbage for Butler. Add in Exum, 3 more first rounders. Lord Almighty why u disgrace Jazz fans w this? Do not make us look bad!

He has no right bring disgrace to Jazz to the world with THIS!!!!
 
Are u kidding?

late first rounders and a couple what ifs for a all start 2 way player? Guaranteed Chicago says no that offering.
I thought YOU were kidding. I'm not saying the OP trade gets us Butler, but 5 firsts, Exum, Hood, and Burks is just ridiculous.
 
I thought YOU were kidding. I'm not saying the OP trade gets us Butler, but 5 firsts, Exum, Hood, and Burks is just ridiculous.

That is only the starting offer. Ridiculous to think we get a all star for late first round picks and salary filler. Hood is pretty much the only asset in that bag of trash offering.
 
What if you tweak it a bit...

Rodney Hood, Alec Burks, Gobert, GSW 17' pick in a good draft
For
Jimmy Butler and Joakim Noah

Why for Jazz : get eastern all star wing and a veteran big
Why for Bulls: get a up and coming wing starter Hood, a starting C in Rudy, 6th man stud Burks on great contract, and a 1st round pick.
 
I would do the OP trade in a heartbeat. We get a solid defender and a solid scorer that takes tons of pressure of Hayward and allows him to be the number 2 guy who can facilitate more and when he has big games and shots going in can take over that game. It also gives us an elite defense. Exum is potentially an elite pg on defense, Hayward is a really good defender, Butler is a great defender, Favors is a great defender and Gobert is an elite defender. Butler would love playing with this team. Butler and Hayward have both been run ragged by their coaches over the last few years hopefully this would let both play a little less and run less miles on the court in a season.

The trade [MENTION=2564]SLCHooper[/MENTION] just posted is a hell no for me. Noah looks to be done or at least not a starter anymore and Rudy is on the rise still.

I think I would prefer getting DeRozan or maybe Beal as a FA over losing Hood and Burk and picks for Butler but those players are unlikely to come here. This trade is a possibility.

If we picked up Butler and traded him for a draft pick I would be very disappointed though.
 
Weird op

Are Hood and Burks better than the number 2 pick in this draft? It seems weird to make the argument that they are and then advocate to trade them for said pick.

Am I missing something?
 
I dont understand the trading butler again.

Exum, mack, neto
Butler
Hayward
Favors, lyles
Gobert, withey

With the #12 pick get best wing on the board.

Go out and over pay for a good solid veteran like bazemore.

That team is a 4 or 5 seed in the west.
 
What we should be seeing are trades including the 12th pick for a vet to add depth and play a role while also picking up future first rounders and the teams targeted should be contenders.
 
Back
Top