GVC
Well-Known Member
They're not illegal so they're not bad.Nobody ever seems to bring up these so-called legal prescription and non-prescription drugs that many more people are hooked on, and abusing.
They're not illegal so they're not bad.Nobody ever seems to bring up these so-called legal prescription and non-prescription drugs that many more people are hooked on, and abusing.
How many 30ish adults have not smoked weed?
Completely acceptable recreation. You might even say a perfect example of good behavior.Been blacked out drunk before
Illegal does not equal bad, but they certainly are synonymous. It's funny that you guys are trying to argue otherwise.
Maybe you don't understand the expression "no ****, Sherlock". You plainly equated bad directly with illegal. You've yet to explain what's particularly "bad" about "dopers".Illegal does not equal bad, but they certainly are synonymous.
Sorry to break it to you, but alcohol is a drug. And a much harsher one.Me. I've never done any illegal drugs. Been blacked out drunk before, but no drugs.
Archie should get high more often instead of making ridiculous statements (such as bad and illegal being synonymous). Don't let Uncle Sam spank you, guy!!! Although, I guess his stance does make him perfectly employable for lower- and mid-level positions since he's clearly brainwashable.
Probably why he said illegal.Sorry to break it to you, but alcohol is a drug. And a much harsher one.
Illegal does not equal bad, but they certainly are synonymous. It's funny that you guys are trying to argue otherwise.
And responded with this:GVC said:The point is you've equated doing something illegal with being bad.
No backpeddling can change that.Archie Moses said:No **** Sherlock
You copied this:
And responded with this:
No backpeddling can change that.
Do you disagree? If so, please explain.
The point is some of us want to talk about what a reasonable standard for bad behavior is.I herd marijain cauzz like kancur and stuff huseein osama needz to git booted so we git a reel amerkan to ban all plants!!
The point is some of us want to talk about the sufficient conditions for something to be illegal.
That is, it seems now, despite what archie said earlier, that he can agree that all not all things that are illegal are bad. Maybe he'd even admit that some historical illegal activities have been pretty beneficial, and that those who participated in those activities were not only not bad, but good. The founding fathers of America, and other American revolutionaries, are perfect examples of this.
This implies that illegality isn't a sufficient condition for concluding that either the breaking of the law or the breaker of the law is bad. The questions still remain: If illegality isn't a sufficient condition, what is/are? And, how does marijuana fit the implicit standard in your answer to that question.