What's new

Kanter traded to OKC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well for starters not have your GM state that he'll only trade a player for "X" and then 48 hours later trade him for less than "X"

Let me know if I can help you with your Bargaining and Bartering 101 midterm. Don't want you to flunk it.
 
Well for starters not have your GM state that he'll only trade a player for "X" and then 48 hours later trade him for less than "X"

Wait I'm confused on this. Lindsey said he was looking for a 1st round draft pick and a young player according to tweets. What he got was a 1st round draft pick, A 21 year old player, Plus a Euro that shows potential. So where exactly did he fail on what he said.
 
de8b8f3fa0a0316e7dd2cab6bff4e76b.jpg
1e725eb8fd8f8f4812be2e93d5b9939e.jpg
 
Adrian Wojnarowski: Enes Kanter and Utah never seriously discussed a rookie extension in October, but Thunder made deal with intentions of signing young center.



i was reading this article and i thought that the first two years Enes Kanter could't get change because reason Big Al and Paul Milsap later Utah Jazz didnt support him later utah didnt give contract to him and im asking you guys 4 years utah management didnt trust him what could he do? nothing because utah management never given trust to him and he never had future for utah jazz , he is free enes anymore he will be super star and you guys will see real enes


I just took away your rep again.
 
I'm always skeptical of someone whose join date is 2012 and goes back in history to 2010 to try to dump on a well known as a solid poster. What's your agenda here?

No agenda. I was just sick of reading about how ****ty he thinks our management is. I have a higher view of the management, and see the trade from a different light. I brought up the Hayward thing because that quote if gvc liking Babbitt over Hayward has been around a few tines, and not only that, but he said it was a huge mistake to match Haywards max offer. Can you imagine how bad it would have been for the team if we didn't match Haywards offer? Judging from Haywards play thus year, he is clearly worth it.
 
Old man: the NBA has changed

Big Al was a better player than Kanter is now-- we got him for what equates to a pretty similar deal


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes from a franchise that's been spinning their wheels for almost a decade now.
 
Kanter had two big surgeries in the last two off-seasons and couldn't work on his game....he will improve for sure!

OKC know how to choose the players...they didn't take him by chance!

Its ok my friend. He is gone now. You can like Jazz or maybe like the Thunder now. We can't keep yelling.
 
No agenda. I was just sick of reading about how ****ty he thinks our management is. I have a higher view of the management, and see the trade from a different light. I brought up the Hayward thing because that quote if gvc liking Babbitt over Hayward has been around a few tines, and not only that, but he said it was a huge mistake to match Haywards max offer. Can you imagine how bad it would have been for the team if we didn't match Haywards offer? Judging from Haywards play thus year, he is clearly worth it.

Frank said U have an agenda?


GVC definitely has an agenda, actually: the dude has never said a single positive remark with regards to Dennis Lindsey
 
Wait I'm confused on this. Lindsey said he was looking for a 1st round draft pick and a young player according to tweets. What he got was a 1st round draft pick, A 21 year old player, Plus a Euro that shows potential. So where exactly did he fail on what he said.

Yes and when we all read DL said he wanted "young talent" we all predicted this "young talent" would be what amounts to their 7th D-League player on the roster this season and a back-up Euro who is about to be let out of his contract.
 
Well for starters not have your GM state that he'll only trade a player for "X" and then 48 hours later trade him for less than "X"

Lol, dude, srs? Ever heard of inflating market demand?
 
No agenda. I was just sick of reading about how ****ty he thinks our management is. I have a higher view of the management, and see the trade from a different light. I brought up the Hayward thing because that quote if gvc liking Babbitt over Hayward has been around a few tines, and not only that, but he said it was a huge mistake to match Haywards max offer. Can you imagine how bad it would have been for the team if we didn't match Haywards offer? Judging from Haywards play thus year, he is clearly worth it.

Fortunately we have the money to buy Babbitt this offseason. He is unrestricted. Imagine if we had Hayward AND Babbitt!
 
Yes and when we all read DL said he wanted "young talent" we all predicted this "young talent" would be what amounts to their 7th D-League player on the roster this season and a back-up Euro who is about to be let out of his contract.

What do you mean, let out of his contract?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top