What's new

Knicks may be open to trading their pick for multiple, lower picks

Flc

Well-Known Member
Sounds like if Lindsey wants Russell or one of Towns/Okafor - assuming the lottery shakes out in its current order - it likely could be done without giving up anyone on our current roster, We have the assets in multiple first round future picks to make the deal.

Wall Street Journal:

‏@HerringWSJ
If Knicks were to trade the pick, seems far more likely that they'd do it to move down/get multiple picks than to get a star in return.
 
Why would the Knicks, who need to start winning soon, trade their great pick for lesser future firsts? Makes no sense.

but hey they are the Knicks...
 
This years #12 pick
Next years unprotected pick
2017 GS pick
2018 OKC pick
4 Second rounders
Burke

Deal.
 
This only makes sense if they are trading with someone like Philly.

I could see Philly giving the Knicks their pick, Miami's pick, and Saric (who is basically a draft pick) for the top pick.
 
4 first rounders, 4 second rounders and Burke?

No thanks, that's to much. If the Jazz sent all that Id want more back then one pick.
 
Why would the Knicks, who need to start winning soon, trade their great pick for lesser future firsts? Makes no sense.

but hey they are the Knicks...

Knicks don't value the draft - they drafted all of 3 players in the last 30 years that either played any significant amount of time or had a significant impact on the franchise - David Lee, Mark Jackson and Patrick Ewing. The rest were either busts, role players or traded away in a year or two.

Knicks are the poster child for big market mentality - they're all about big name trades and big name FA's.
 
Knicks are sooooo dumb. Lets just trade them Burke and our pick from this draft, I bet that would get it done.
 
Knicks don't value the draft -

Then it seems kind of strange that they are wanting even more drafts picks in this trade scenario
 
Knicks are dumb... If they don't land 1 or 2 I could see them trading back. 12 is prolly too far back and the future firsts are too far off.

Anyone that wouldn't trade the 4 firsts and Burke for a top 3 pick is stupid... Anytime you can trade 4 quarters for a dollar you do it.
 
Who would you take at #1?

Towns or Russell. I might take towns and see what the team who takes Russell will give me for him... If not I'd just keep Towns.
 
Why would we do that when we're already going to get a top three pick? Karma told me that the odds will be ever in our favor as God wants us to win.



















tldr answer: russell[/QUOTE]
 
This years #12 pick
Next years unprotected pick
2017 GS pick
2018 OKC pick
4 Second rounders
Burke

Deal.

I wouldn't take this if I were the Knicks, assuming they get the number one pick.

And it's more likely than not that the Knicks just said this to increase the value of their pick.
 
The Knicks are such a mess, it's hard to know what they're going to do. On one hand, they should be trying to win now due to the fact that Melo is locked in long-term at big $, but on the other hand, they haven't put anyone around him. They have a few decent prospects (Hardaway jr, Larkin, Early) & a couple young(ish) players who are putting up solid #s (Shved, Aldrich). Other than Melo & Calderon, I don't think they have any high salary commitments on the books beyond this year, so I'd imagine they will pursue a top FA such as Love or Aldridge. If they do get the #1 pick, I could see them going with Okafor, as he is likely the most NBA ready prospect, to pair with KL/LA in the front court.

PG Calderon/Larkin
SG Hardaway/Shved
SF Melo/Early
PF KL or LA/?
C Okafor/Aldrich

Not much defense but that roster could still be playoff bound (barring injuries), due to how weak the Eastern Conference is, but not an actual contender. If they fall out of the top 2, I could see them trading the pick, as they need a big man long-term, & Okafor/Towns will likely go top 2. If their pick did slip to #3, I could see them moving it, in which case I'd gladly trade #12+future 1st+OKC+GSW+(1 of) Burke/Burks/Hood for Russell. Not sure that makes sense for NYK tho.

Personally, if I were them, I'd try to get Melo/Calderon off the books & build around Towns or Russell, as I don't see them contending even with the signing of a big time FA. They are lucky they're the Knicks bc any other team (besides LAL) would be screwed for the next 5+ yrs (like BKN is). They are still the Knicks though so something will happen as the NBA needs them to be at least somewhat relevant.

I think they end up signing a big time FA, trade their pick for a ton of assets & package them along with their other prospects for a 3rd marquee player to go along with Melo & whoever they sign. No idea what star player would actually be available in a trade, tho.
 
Obviously picking a future star would be great but that's not a given in this or any draft, and frankly I would be happy drafting some stud role players to really round out this team over the next three years.
 
Back
Top