Heaven forbid if a hot woman gets badly sunburned. It is a very temporary negative. That Meg picture is decent but it is VERY VERY old. Her tragic plastic surgeries have left her repulsive and looking very much like that kid in Mask. Kim doesn't have to be everyone's "type", but don't exaggerate your point to a falsehood. And yes Meg USED TO BE "ok", but I don't know any man in person that actually says she still looks even average anymore.
kris humphries is avail !
- Thread starter gasol_stopper_ante_tomic
- Start date
Heaven forbid if a hot woman gets badly sunburned. It is a very temporary negative. That Meg picture is decent but it is VERY VERY old. Her tragic plastic surgeries have left her repulsive and looking very much like that kid in Mask. Kim doesn't have to be everyone's "type", but don't exaggerate your point to a falsehood. And yes Meg USED TO BE "ok", but I don't know any man in person that actually says she still looks even average anymore.
Mr. McGibblets
Well-Known Member
Jimmy eats jazz, a few quick points:
1. You are the only person here dealing in absolutes. Please link to the post where people are saying she's the "most beautiful." You keep mis-characterizing people's statements about Ms. Kardashian. Nobody claimed she was the most beautiful, merely that she is good looking and there are not a million women in the world who are better looking (as you claimed). You are using a logical fallacy by comparing this Kardashian debate to your Cascade Mountains example. I believe this is is a strawman.
2. You claimed you could find a million people better looking than her and people called you on it. So...you go off about how cultured you are and we have no idea. The way you went about it implied that because of your experience, other people's opinions are invalid or not as valued as yours. This is why I said you sound like a douche. And I stand by it. Plus, Ms. Kardashian is Armenian, it's not like she's an American WASP.
3. Just because person A has seen 100 mountain ranges does not mean that person B who has only seen 20 cannot could still have a legitimate opinion about what qualifies as a really beautiful mountain range. Nor does it mean that one of the 20 mountain ranges seen by person B could not be one of the most beautiful. However, you have rejected this.
1. You are the only person here dealing in absolutes. Please link to the post where people are saying she's the "most beautiful." You keep mis-characterizing people's statements about Ms. Kardashian. Nobody claimed she was the most beautiful, merely that she is good looking and there are not a million women in the world who are better looking (as you claimed). You are using a logical fallacy by comparing this Kardashian debate to your Cascade Mountains example. I believe this is is a strawman.
2. You claimed you could find a million people better looking than her and people called you on it. So...you go off about how cultured you are and we have no idea. The way you went about it implied that because of your experience, other people's opinions are invalid or not as valued as yours. This is why I said you sound like a douche. And I stand by it. Plus, Ms. Kardashian is Armenian, it's not like she's an American WASP.
3. Just because person A has seen 100 mountain ranges does not mean that person B who has only seen 20 cannot could still have a legitimate opinion about what qualifies as a really beautiful mountain range. Nor does it mean that one of the 20 mountain ranges seen by person B could not be one of the most beautiful. However, you have rejected this.
20 is not a large enough sample size statistically, so therefore a person who saw only 20 mountain ranges does not have a legitimate opinion. That person would have to have seen at least 30 mountain ranges to have a valid opinion.
I am right, everyone else is wrong.
Wrong, Wrong, Wrong.
