Sounds like he could be had for the asking. Only one year left on his contract, and the guy has got game if there's a coach who could get him to respond. Or would he be a cancer, a headache? Imagine, though, if he came to the Jazz and played up to his former level. We certainly could afford it, but would we be playing with fire? Swap Trey for him, maybe even get another second rounder? Just a spontaneous idea, haven't really thought it out or tried to learn what really is Stephenson's problem.
Sounds like he could be had for the asking. Only one year left on his contract, and the guy has got game if there's a coach who could get him to respond. Or would he be a cancer, a headache? Imagine, though, if he came to the Jazz and played up to his former level. We certainly could afford it, but would we be playing with fire? Swap Trey for him, maybe even get another second rounder? Just a spontaneous idea, haven't really thought it out or tried to learn what really is Stephenson's problem.
Read the article it explains why. Basically the team is significantly worse anytime he's on the floor.He's playing great so I dont see why
Beer was being facetiousRead the article it explains why. Basically the team is significantly worse anytime he's on the floor.
Not I.Every booger eater that said we should sign Lance instead of Hayward, and there were many, should have to apologize in this thread.
Not I.
I was always a Stephenson hater.
I was one of the people who wanted ariza at 8 or 9 mil instead of Hayward at the max.
I was wrong about that too.
Sorry Hayward
Sounds like he could be had for the asking. Only one year left on his contract, and the guy has got game if there's a coach who could get him to respond. Or would he be a cancer, a headache? Imagine, though, if he came to the Jazz and played up to his former level. We certainly could afford it, but would we be playing with fire? Swap Trey for him, maybe even get another second rounder? Just a spontaneous idea, haven't really thought it out or tried to learn what really is Stephenson's problem.
This was me. Never liked Lance. But did not believe in Hayward at the max. I wanted Chandler Parsons. I suppose I was also wrong because I would not trade Hayward for Parsons now.Not I.
I was always a Stephenson hater.
I was one of the people who wanted ariza at 8 or 9 mil instead of Hayward at the max.
I was wrong about that too.
Sorry Hayward
1. And this is what the Jazz board has devolved into: Public shaming, self congratulating, and little else.Every booger eater that said we should sign Lance instead of Hayward, and there were many, should have to apologize in this thread.