Seriously...
What does Burke do better than Cotton?
Nothing, and I am one of Burkes only supporters.
Seriously...
What does Burke do better than Cotton?
Hey neighbor!
Enjoying the rain today? Better than the heat wave a week or so ago eh?
The term "lumberjack" is racistIf it's offensive to someone it's racist. Just recognize and move on.
This.He has an above average dribbling and passing skills compared to the average PFs in the league already at this age.
You did nothing wrong when you mentioned the African American announcer.No sweat White Choc, my bad for leading the discussion that way![]()
Here's Lyles' line for today FYI:
One browCarolina Jazz should be on this thread like flies on ****
Dude, I already said I don't care about the term "Redskins" they could be called the Washington "Native Americans" and I would still feel weird about it. You just don't name a sports team after a group of people you nearly wiped out. Just a big no-no in my book.
Like have you taken a history class? We kind of ****ed the Native Americans in the ***.
Dude, I already said I don't care about the term "Redskins" they could be called the Washington "Native Americans" and I would still feel weird about it. You just don't name a sports team after a group of people you nearly wiped out. Just a big no-no in my book.
Like have you taken a history class? We kind of ****ed the Native Americans in the ***.
The term "lumberjack" is racist
Haha... PKM will have something to say about that he ain't just gonna take that.
Probably the single worst game thread in recorded forum history.
In the world we live in today? Yes, some one of a different race or culture would find it offensive.If al Native Americans thought the name redskins was a sign of honor, would it still be racist?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
At first, it was the diseases. The lack of immunity. A huge % of Native Americans died from disease before Europeans even settled in. When the Pilgrims landed, and when the Puritans arrived in the Boston area, they found nothing but abandoned villages. The entire Massachusett tribe wiped out by something. Smallpox, measles, who knows. Squanto returned to New England to find his tribe no longer existed. European fishermen did that. The Portuguese were fishing off North America even before Columbus set sail, and bringing their diseases with them. The first really major war between Europeans and Native Americans in what is now the US was New England's King Philip's War, 1675-76. As they had learned in the earlier Pequot War(1637), the English practiced something that appalled the natives, namely total war, burn entire villages, kill every last man, woman, and child. In the attack on the Pequot Fort in 1637, when Narragansett warriors who allied with the English saw what the English were doing, they either fired their guns in the air, or left. Murdering women and the elderly was not part of the game plan when native fought native.
That may be true in this case, but my reading of history is quite different. Natives (or at least some natives or tribes of natives) often killed, and even scalped women and children, in addition to the men during raids on settlements or during other conflicts. Just one example, the Deerfield raid in 1704 during Queen Anne's war.
In the world we live in today? Yes, some one of a different race or culture would find it offensive.
Literally anything anyone says will probably be offensive to someone somewhere these days