Retards can use the r-word, so yer good.
Las Vegas: Worst Mass Shooting in US History
- Thread starter Red
- Start date
Retards can use the r-word, so yer good.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Lol. I have been listening to this conservative radio talk show host by the name of Lars Larsen here in Portland. He's basically a mini-me version of Rush Limbaugh.
Anyway, after all the boggety man paranoia that was spread around over the idea that Obama was going to take everybody's guns away, now the same people are blaming Obama for bump stocks since they were allowed under his presidency.
Larsen also tried to make the claim that the shooter could have killed more people without automatic fire by picking people off one by one. Some people really start reaching when they are desperate to defend their side unconditionally.
Last edited:
DutchJazzer
Banned
if i can see the ironyu of the left. then the left is more R than me!
because demanding the guy you think is hitler to take the guns! is a special kind of stupid!
DutchJazzer
Banned
it might seem insensitive to talk about this.
but netflix pushed back the punisher because of the las vegas shooting.
what do you peeps think about this. ofcourse they have every right to.
but still it kinda sucks
but netflix pushed back the punisher because of the las vegas shooting.
what do you peeps think about this. ofcourse they have every right to.
but still it kinda sucks
DutchJazzer
Banned
do any of you guys know how a bumpstock works. and that NRA and GOP don't mind banning it?
it will absolute be a worthless regulation. as i can print a bumpstock in about an hour, so let's say their is a bumpstock ban before the vegas shooting.
the perpetrator would jsut buy a 3d printer and print 100.000 bumpstocks! and everything else will be exactly the same!]
the most useless law. or do any of you think a bumpstock ban would have him go like gee i wish i had bumpstocks. but ooh well they are illegal so i wont 3d print 1. even though is murder is against the i am gonna break that law, but not the bump stock ban law!
this is just security theather! meaning people playing and acting like they are doing something to make you feel secure, but it does 0.0!
it will absolute be a worthless regulation. as i can print a bumpstock in about an hour, so let's say their is a bumpstock ban before the vegas shooting.
the perpetrator would jsut buy a 3d printer and print 100.000 bumpstocks! and everything else will be exactly the same!]
the most useless law. or do any of you think a bumpstock ban would have him go like gee i wish i had bumpstocks. but ooh well they are illegal so i wont 3d print 1. even though is murder is against the i am gonna break that law, but not the bump stock ban law!
this is just security theather! meaning people playing and acting like they are doing something to make you feel secure, but it does 0.0!
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Man do these guys receive marching orders from the same source? Rod Arquette, conservative radio Host here in Utah made the exact same arguments. He even peppered in the whole, "we need to focus on mental health and turning back to God" thing. It's just uncanny how predicable the right is after these massacres. Like seriously, how do they circulate such a well coordinated homogeneous message nationally? So impressive.
DutchJazzer
Banned
the rinos are banning a peace of plastic to appease the leftist!
how in the world do you think banning a peace of plastic is a good measure to prevent something.
is the general public really that stupid! i almost wanna print a 3d bump stock so you can see. but then they would ban 3d printers
how in the world do you think banning a peace of plastic is a good measure to prevent something.
is the general public really that stupid! i almost wanna print a 3d bump stock so you can see. but then they would ban 3d printers
Sounds bout time to register an license all 3D printing than. Track all material sales an require reporting ta federal agencies what ya made an require unannounced inspection of any facility that owns one.
Red
Well-Known Member
You only have to worry about the Netherlands banning 3D printers, remember?
DutchJazzer
Banned
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Bump stocks are really easy to make at home. A ban won't do much for someone is determined. I still think they need to be banned so some nut job can't just buy one easily but it don't stop someone like this guy from making his own. Especially with the level of planning that had to go into this.
Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Yep. I posted a video earlier in this thread of a guy using only his hands, holding a handgun in a way that operates it the same way a bump stock works. It fired as if it was a fully automatic glock. Not to mention that others devices exist that give similar results.
The laws are going to have to be re-written to include any device that allows a weapon to be fired as if it were full auto.
DutchJazzer
Banned
could you please explain me how it is rewritten?
are you ignoring the fact that litterally i can literally print any kind of bumpstock in less then an hour!
it is like people are ignoring facts and just want laws and regulations just as a virtue signal. even though it means and does NOTHING!
Not really. I think what Dutch is implying here is that a psychopath who is willing to commit mass murder and die on the scene is unlikely to be deterred by the additional penalty of jail time or a fine for possessing illegal arms.
Did room service not notice the armory he was amassing in his hotel room? It seems like this is a hotel security issue among other things.
Cappy_Smurf
Well-Known Member
Just like Log pointed out, anyone who wants to modify a semi-auto to fire essentially as a full auto, will have no problem doing so. That still isn't a good reason to have items like bump stocks easily available.
As for how it is written, I don't know why I even bother responding to such a dumb question, but it will be NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER, to figure out how to ban full auto mods. How about just saying ANY MOD THAT ALLOWS FIRE AT A RATE OF <x> OR FASTER IS ILLEGAL?
Nothing irritates more than arguments about how it will be too difficult to figure something out, so let's not even try.
Modifying a semi into an auto is illegal. Bump stocks are more of a loophole to that law. They don't fit into the current modifications law.
A bunch of stories circulating on Youtube are claiming there were multiple shooters from the hotel. There are also claims of machine gun fire (loud, rapid rate of fire) rather than semi-automatic rifle fire.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
What about when people post on a discussion forum what they are reading online directly after a terrorist attack while indicating they don't know if it's true or not? How much does that irritate you? Please quantify.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Careful, some unltra-sensitive people read this and expect only 100% truth and verified sources to confirm such claims should be posted in here.