homeytennis
Well-Known Member
The guy goes all the way through camp and gets the pink slip. Tinsely comes in and the record is 0-3. Couldn't have done worse with Lester as the backup.
The guy goes all the way through camp and gets the pink slip. Tinsely comes in and the record is 0-3. Couldn't have done worse with Lester as the backup.
the **** is this.
Acid. This is acid.
Tinsley has really logged major minutes for us and scored a boatload of points and dished out assists like John Stockton. Not
The guy goes all the way through camp and gets the pink slip. Tinsely comes in and the record is 0-3. Couldn't have done worse with Lester as the backup.
The question was who would be better to work with Burke when he comes back, not who would win more early games.
Any questions, oh and this by the way.
If that were the case, why wasn't Tinsley signed this summer to do that? The Tinsley signing was a mark of desperation by the Jazz FO.
If that were the case, why wasn't Tinsley signed this summer to do that? The Tinsley signing was a mark of desperation by the Jazz FO.
Maybe that should tell you something about Hudson. The Jazz were desperate to take an old, worn down Tinsley over him. Wonder why...
If that were the case, why wasn't Tinsley signed this summer to do that? The Tinsley signing was a mark of desperation by the Jazz FO.
I suppose the value combination of playing time and training eclipsed the cost for the Jazz, when just training did not.
Locke has thrown everyone other than the Core 4 under the bus. I'm not sure why he pi$$ed on Gobert but he has. He really singled out Lucas and Tinsley for special commendation. Hindsight is 20-20 but it seems like they should have kept Scottie and Hudson and sent Lucas on his way and never signed Tinsley. The TANK is working.
IIRC, Lucas was signed before camp began. Keeping Hudson over Lucas was unlikely, and if we had, many of the same people would be complaining we cut Lucas.