What's new

Little known rule was utilized tonight

Stifle Tower

Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Interesting sidenote from the Lakers/Cavs game:

The Lakers had eight available players coming into the game. Then Nick Young twisted his left knee in the first half and Chris Kaman fouled out early in the fourth quarter. When Jordan Farmar left with leg cramps in the final period, that put Los Angeles at five players. Sacre committed his sixth foul with 3:32 remaining, but stayed in the game because D'Antoni was out of healthy bodies. The Lakers were assessed a technical foul.


Each side has to have five players on the court at all times during an NBA game. With the Lakers down to five healthy players, D'Antoni was informed by the officials that he could leave Sacre on the floor and any addition foul on the center would also result in a technical. ''I didn't know about that rule, but it's a nice rule,'' D'Antoni said with a chuckle. The Lakers were without Steve Nash (rest), Jodie Meeks (sprained ankle) and Jordan Hill (strained neck). Pau Gasol (groin) and Kobe Bryant (knee) remained in Los Angeles for the three-game road trip.


The situation was so unusual that Nash, who was in street clothes, went to the locker room and put on his uniform late in the game, but D'Antoni said he had no intention of putting the point guard into the game. ''I was not going to go to Nash - it was not an option to us - but the other thing we talked about was having Jordan go out there and just stand in the corner,'' D'Antoni said. ''When the officials came over to explain the options to me, we decided to keep Robert out there. I knew he would be smart and not commit too many more fouls.''

I'm too lazy to look it up, but I wonder if/when this has happened before in the NBA.
 
Yeah, it has. Kevin Pelton tweeted that it happened to the Warriors TWICE in the 2009-10 season.

In addition, I saw it almost 30 years ago in a Jazz-Hawks game in the Salt Palace. Hawks dressed the minimum number of 8 players, then lost 4 to either injuries or fouls, so one had to stay in.
 
Yeah, it has. Kevin Pelton tweeted that it happened to the Warriors TWICE in the 2009-10 season.

In addition, I saw it almost 30 years ago in a Jazz-Hawks game in the Salt Palace. Hawks dressed the minimum number of 8 players, then lost 4 to either injuries or fouls, so one had to stay in.
Thanks for the info. Didn't realize it had been done so recently. 2009-10 must have been the year GS utilized so many D-League players.
 
I've said it before, the Lakers will get the #1 pick. The Celtics will be in the top 3.
 
I've used this method on NBA Live '98 once to keep my best player on the floor away from foul trouble. Fouled out every single reserve and finally got left only with 5 players so my go-to-guy had infinite fouls to foul out.
 
About 25 years ago I was in a youth basketball church league and the same thing happened. They handled it the exact same way. 2-Shot tech and the team gets the ball back.

I think the rules are (or were) different in college, I'm pretty sure I remember a story from Rick Majerus' autobiography where he had to play 4 players because the fifth fouled out (before he was with Utah)
 
About 25 years ago I was in a youth basketball church league and the same thing happened. They handled it the exact same way. 2-Shot tech and the team gets the ball back.

I think the rules are (or were) different in college, I'm pretty sure I remember a story from Rick Majerus' autobiography where he had to play 4 players because the fifth fouled out (before he was with Utah)

Jazz were always going 4 on 5 when Brewer was the SG, well at least on offense. :o
 
In soccer, it is default and they are considered beaten 0-3 when the 11 player team falls down to 6 players of red cards (which also is a rare occurrence). So I think this rule is nice.
 
Actually, I also liked the old "ABA" rule! The ABA had no foul-out rule. When a player committed his sixth personal foul, he could stay in the game. However, subsequent fouls by that particular player resulted in two free throws plus possession of the ball for the opposing team.

This would keep the star player in the game...but the penalty was much steeper than this abstract rule the NBA has in vogue today!
 
They won the game.
Somebody had too. That's what's great about 2 tanking teams playing each other...it's a war of wills to see which bench players are going to rebel against their coaches and have good games. I thought it was funny that Nash went and put on his jersey. Brought to mind the lyrics "put me in coach"...even though I relaize that's a song about baseball.
 
Interesting sidenote from the Lakers/Cavs game:

The Lakers had eight available players coming into the game. Then Nick Young twisted his left knee in the first half and Chris Kaman fouled out early in the fourth quarter. When Jordan Farmar left with leg cramps in the final period, that put Los Angeles at five players. Sacre committed his sixth foul with 3:32 remaining, but stayed in the game because D'Antoni was out of healthy bodies. The Lakers were assessed a technical foul.


Each side has to have five players on the court at all times during an NBA game. With the Lakers down to five healthy players, D'Antoni was informed by the officials that he could leave Sacre on the floor and any addition foul on the center would also result in a technical.

Was putting Kaman back in under those same conditions also an option?
 
Idiot OP should know better...this belongs in the NBA Forum as it has nothing to do with the Jazz. $#%^ troll!
 
Yeah, it has. Kevin Pelton tweeted that it happened to the Warriors TWICE in the 2009-10 season.

In addition, I saw it almost 30 years ago in a Jazz-Hawks game in the Salt Palace. Hawks dressed the minimum number of 8 players, then lost 4 to either injuries or fouls, so one had to stay in.
I remember that game, that's why I was kinda shocked how much attention this Lakers game was getting for it. The way the media was handling it, was like it NEVER happened before. I guess since it's the Lakers, it's big news.
 
Back
Top