billyshelby
Well-Known Member
Locke is a master apologist for Hayward, and I just want to make sure I have them all recorded. The reasons I've picked up:
1. Hayward has struggled being the number one option (never mind that no team ever schemes against him)
2. Hayward is better when he gets assisted baskets (Locke really said this)
3. Hayward has run more miles than anyone (he's so tired)
4. Hayward is never bad, but sometimes he's apparently "disengaged".
5. Now Locke is posting that the Jazz pace may be hurting him. Never mind that, as a primary ball handler, Hayward has a lot to do with that slow pace, or that pace has nothing to do with the fact he's missing nearly all his shots.
I'm guessing number 5 will be he's mistakenly been wearing the wrong size shoes. Or maybe he just needs to play 42 minutes instead of 36. But there obviously has to be a reason for Hayward's play that has nothing at all to do with his natural ability. That's for sure.
1. Hayward has struggled being the number one option (never mind that no team ever schemes against him)
2. Hayward is better when he gets assisted baskets (Locke really said this)
3. Hayward has run more miles than anyone (he's so tired)
4. Hayward is never bad, but sometimes he's apparently "disengaged".
5. Now Locke is posting that the Jazz pace may be hurting him. Never mind that, as a primary ball handler, Hayward has a lot to do with that slow pace, or that pace has nothing to do with the fact he's missing nearly all his shots.
I'm guessing number 5 will be he's mistakenly been wearing the wrong size shoes. Or maybe he just needs to play 42 minutes instead of 36. But there obviously has to be a reason for Hayward's play that has nothing at all to do with his natural ability. That's for sure.