I broke it down to the gist, eh, Kicky? Ya gotta problem wit dat? Ya tryin to say I misquoted sumthin?
Yes. By definition you misquoted.
You presented statements out of order, inserted statements that are not in the original text, and presented it in a format, with quotation marks, that made it appear to be one coherent statement. You presented words in an order never written by Max Stirner as if they were written by him verbatim.
There's significant sections from the original you've excised.
For example: "Only my cause is never to be my concern. Shame on the egoist who thinks only of himself!"
You've also taken out the entire middle section which is designed to demonstrate the selfish and egoistic nature of God's plan and design and the way in which he relates to humanity. Arguably you have completely subverted the meaning of the writing of Stirner by presenting it as a celebration of egoism rather than his much deeper point about separate kinds of egoism in individuals vs. egoism in entities.
Example: "I have no need to take up each thing that wants to throw its cause on us and show that it is occupied only with itself, not with us, only with its good, not with ours. Look at the rest for yourselves. Do truth, freedom, humanity, justice, desire anything else than that you grow enthusiastic and serve them?
They all have an admirable time of it when they receive zealous homage. Just observe the nation that is defended by devoted patriots. The patriots fall in bloody battle or in the fight with hunger and want; what does the nation care for that? By the manure of their corpses the nation comes to "its bloom"! The individuals have died "for the great cause of the nation," and the nation sends some words of thanks after them and - has the profit of it. I call that a paying kind of egoism."
