They (Spurs) did not tank on purpose,
yes they did
They (Spurs) did not tank on purpose,
I think 2 wins and we wrap this baby up. Tomorrow would be a nice win, especially if Portland shuts Aldridge down.
yes they did
You are not the boss of me.How do did they tank? I'm dieing to hear this!
You are not the boss of me.
You go ahead and prove that they did not tank on purpose!
One at a time. Rust and me are discussing the Spurs tanking and getting Duncun.
their three best players that year were david robinson, sean elliott and an over-the-hill 'nique. the first two were injured for basically the entire year, the third was remarkably inefficient. they didn't tank, they just sucked.
I'm not going to review the sides of this debate, but doesn't the argument hinge on one's stance about whether Robinson (and Elliott?) sat out for way longer than they really needed to?
doesn't your point lose all credibility when you start it with "i'm not going to review the sides..."? basically you're saying you're not going to be bothered by the details of the situation, but rather accept a broad, revisionist view of what happened.
david robinson injured his back in the preseason, worked hard to return to the court , but six games into his return he broke his foot. are you suggesting that he should have been fine to throw some ice on a broken foot and return in a week?
elliott was in and out of the lineup for the first half of the season, battling a chronic quad injury. after a setback in early february, he finally opted for a quad tendon surgery that usually requires 4-6 months of recovery time. you're saying he milked it by missing the final 38 games of the season?
ok well then the answer to your earnest question is no, it doesn't appear either guy unnecessarily milked a minor injury. sorry for misreading your post as an assertion that they did.
Nerd, you have proven nothing, lots of teams suffer injuries without getting a #1 pick.