35, they take bell, and remove the protection next year. Otherwise no.
I like it. No idea whether they do. Us negotiating too strongly, then losing the odds is pretty dumb .. so we can't push too damn hard.
35, they take bell, and remove the protection next year. Otherwise no.
Excellent question. If Curry and Bogut stay healthy they could be a 4 or 5 seed, imo. But they won't stay healthy and I think, depending upon how unhealthy they are, they'll wind up in the 12 - 15 range.
One name you forgot to mention: Mark Jackson
He sucks hard and the west is still very deep. I think even if healthy the best they get wil be 12 or 13
We give them their pick this year and they give BluesRocker AIDS, its a done deal signed sealed and delivered.
I keep trying to put myself into the warriors position and my IQ keeps dropping. I think my offer would be either 30 or 35 and or a swap for 47. I could see them liking o'quinn a lot and figure they could get him at 47. I could also see cash be part of the deal.
We give them their pick this year and they give BluesRocker AIDS, its a done deal signed sealed and delivered.
The idea that we have too many rookies is nonsense. First, Hayward and Favors will be in their third year. Next, just because we have four young guys doesn't mean that they'll all pan out. And finally, if we pass on having "another rookie" or two on the roster, who will take their place? People like Miles?
I **** you not. That is exactly what KOC is thinking. I heard from his oen mouth that he doesnt want more youth and we are young enough.
He has no desire to draft in this lottery. He was going to trade the pick even if we got it.
What he is saying, is that he is high.So what you're saying is Jazz trade the 8th pick
for
the 30 + 35 + removal of the protection for our GS pick in '13?
Do I understand this correctly?
'cause that sounds pretty sweet to me.
Why do you got to say stuff like that to me?Eat rat poison, a lot.