What's new

Memo's First Game in Europa

Anybody think that the Jazz try to keep the players they want happy by signing them early when possible (it also should have a positive outlook for potential FA's that the Jazz extend contracts when possible). So many variables and what if's, like how would've he played without extension, what would his attitude be and how would it have effected the team chemistry, how would it have looked and worked combined with the Boozer situation especially since at the time the Jazz only other big men were Fess and Kouf.

Oh and for the record I wasn't happy about the extension but I didn't hate it either given the uncertainty of the future and the lack of quality big men, that and we all kind of figured Booz was as good as gone.
 
And that's it in a nutshell. The Jazz were a flawed team with the Boozer-Okur combo and they were going to be a flawed team with a Millsap-Okur combo. It really doesn't matter if Okur was a top-ten center, because he wasn't the center that the Jazz needed. It doesn't matter that the Jazz couldn't find a better center on the market; if you can't find the player you need, then use cheap fill-ins (Koufus and Fesenko) until a better option comes along. It is a huge mistake for an NBA franchise to commit a 7-figure salary (8 figures on average) to a player that it knows isn't going to help them reach the finals.

In a way, signing Okur was far worse than signing AK, because with Okur we knew exactly what we were getting ... and he wasn't ever going be what we needed. And yes, signing Okur meant closing the door on other options, such as Matthews. And that is where KOC really screwed up -- he closed the door on other options without improving the team in the process.
Fixed.

Wow, ellipse, welcome to JazzFanz. I couldn't have written it better myself. Even when I did.
 
Fixed.

Wow, ellipse, welcome to JazzFanz. I couldn't have written it better myself. Even when I did.

Thanks. But pardon me while I spend the rest of the night hanging my head in shame... (*muttering to self*: Fool! 10 million is 8 figures not 7 ... that math degree just ain't working for ya, is it? &**^%%!)
 
I am sooooo glad that you brought up Greg Ostertag, because he is Exhibit A as to why Fesenko and Koufos needed more than 5 MPG to develop (as if this were actually controversial): Ostertag--despite being undermotivated, like Fesenko--got more minutes in his first season than Fesenko did in his first three seasons. Fesenko's performance was in the neighborhood of Ostertag's.


****Ok, maybe you didnt understand, Ostertag with sloan sucked horribly, but was 10 times a better Ostertag than an Ostertag with any other coach. They used Ostertag because they had no one else! Greg Foster or an arthritic Antoine Carr was your next option!! Ostertag should'nt have been played at all!! But niether should his back ups! And Coach Sloan developed them for the finals! Im not doing anything more than making you look like the *** that you have been for so long. ****Karl Malone was already self motivated, and although Sloan uniquely helped Malone, that example is not particularly relevant to Fesenko and Ostertag, who were both second-rounders and who started with Sloan from the beginning.

*** Not relevant?? Fesenko and Ostertag arent/werent even good enough to play in the NBA!! What about MILLSAP?? Drafted in the second round and the first coach he ran into was Coach Sloan!!! Milsap graps more Double Double's than you do- panty hose for yourself when they're on clearance sale at walmart. Milsap started with Coach Sloan,,, Riight??****
Jarron Collins got twice as much rookie minutes than Ostertag, so thank you again for bringing up Jarron to prove my point. Key difference is that Fesenko has more physical gifts than both 'Tag and Tree (Collins), and Koufos probably has a better jump shot. But Sloan only gave them scraps, even when the existing rotation was sucking.
**** Um Fesenko more talent?? I have personaly ran into Fesenko at 3 different parties and he thinks Busta Ryhmes should be president. He doesnt have enough cordination to smoke a cigarette and hold a drink at the same time. But Hey!! He's your hero. ****With the dire need for big men (on the Jazz and elsewhere), it was foolish for Sloan to not invest more court time in developing these players. This could have been done without sacrificing wins, and chances are the existing rotation would've played better, too, if the scrubs were used to send a message to CB and MO that (all of) their minutes weren't guaranteed.
**** Look cupcake, if you want to send a message to Carlos Boozer all you have to do is play 5 games in a row with under average defense and not stub your toe. Then maybe Carlos would've realized that he was getting payed big bucks $$$ to play through stubbed toes and to protect the basket. After all he is 6 foot 9 inches and 260 lbs of almost all muscle. (Reminds me of Malone, hmmmmm)*****Yes, I do, because once you give a player 10 MPG on a regular basis, then that player can start develop. This applies not only to centers but also to other positions. This applies not only to basketball but to other sports also.
*** Only if they dont give a rats *** for the first 5 minutes their in![/QUOTE]
 
Lakers_slapper said:
****Ok, maybe you didnt understand, Ostertag with sloan sucked horribly, but was 10 times a better Ostertag than an Ostertag with any other coach.
You're speculating here, but it's not unreasonable speculation.

But it's a bit off topic, given that Ostertag--even with arguably similar work ethic--got the minutes, and Fes didn't, and my contention is that KK or KF or both could've gotten more minutes without sacrificing wins--especially when the existing roation was sucking.

And you'd be hard-pressed to prove that Sloan gave the same level of coaching to Fesenko as he did to Ostertag--at least in terms of on-court minutes--a huge discrepancy between the two.

They used Ostertag because they had no one else!
This is a reasonable statement, but Sloan made no effort to develop a center in the Boozakur era, even though a backup C has been shown repeatedly to be a crucial component to a title contender:
1. Trio of Gasol-Bynum-Odom at the 4/5 for the Lakers. (With Kobe, though, they still won, even with Bynum's injury).
2. Trio of Garnett-Perkins-(Wallace/Davis) at the 4/5 for the Celtics.
3. Nowitzki-Chandler-Haywood at the 4/5 for the Mavericks.

Much of the time, the defense of Okur, Boozer, and even Jefferson was as if they had "no one else" in the game playing center.

Greg Foster or an arthritic Antoine Carr was your next option!! Ostertag should'nt have been played at all!! But niether should his back ups! And Coach Sloan developed them for the finals! Im not doing anything more than making you look like the *** that you have been for so long.
Did Sloan "develop" them? Do elaborate.

*** Not relevant?? Fesenko and Ostertag arent/werent even good enough to play in the NBA!!
But Ostertag was given minutes, and Fesenko wasn't. Exactly my point.

What about MILLSAP?? Drafted in the second round and the first coach he ran into was Coach Sloan!!!
I credit the majority of Millsap's success to Millsap. Of course if Fes or 'Tag were self-motivated, the task of development would have been easy, but the ability to develop or improve players with weaknesses is one of many things that can separate an overrated coach (the recent Sloan, for starters) from an excellent coach (Carlisle, Popovich, Thibodeau).

You still haven't addressed the issue of the massive minute differential between Tag and Fes/Koufous (except by weakly pointing out that alternatives were few in the 'Tag era--although neither Boozer nor Okur nor Jefferson was a solution at the 5 spot, especially defensively, either, and often their relatively prolific scoring did not compensate for their piss-poor defense (much more likely minimized if defense had been enforced like you'd expect Sloan to do), thus implying that the true center alternatives were at least as abundant in the Fes/Koko era than during the Tag years).

Milsap graps more Double Double's than you do- panty hose for yourself when they're on clearance sale at walmart. Milsap started with Coach Sloan,,, Riight??****
Lulz. You're still comparing apples (motivated players such as Millsap or Malone who would've likely been successful under most any coach) vs. oranges (unmotivated players such as Ostertag (who benefitted from what was possibly a more active coaching role for Sloan) and Fesenko (who was repeatedly not rewarded with additional playing time--not even to the minimum 10 MPG that I argue to be necessary for legitimate development--even when he did well, thus further implying that the Sloan coaching staff in the last few years put forth less effort in player development of bigs, at minimum when it comes to finding them the essential playing time to develop, which could've been done without sacrificing losses, especially over the course of a year).

**** Um Fesenko more talent?? I have personaly ran into Fesenko at 3 different parties and he thinks Busta Ryhmes should be president. He doesnt have enough cordination to smoke a cigarette and hold a drink at the same time. But Hey!! He's your hero. ****
Off-court smarts does not equate to on-court prowess. Usually helps, but the correlation is weak. Example 1: Jarron Collins, who was an intelligent locker room influence but so-so on the hardwood. Example 2: Karl Malone, who is comparable in this sense because he was no Einstein off the court but still developed into a top PF in NBA history.
Example 3: Allen "do you know who I am?" Iverson.

**** Look cupcake, if you want to send a message to Carlos Boozer all you have to do is play 5 games in a row with under average defense and not stub your toe.
This statement is not relevant to my claim, sweet cheeks; I was referring to the coaching staff sending a message to the players. But maybe your bold-font rant is consistent with the obliviousness or willful ignorance that the coaching staff had toward the defense of the regular 4/5 rotation in recent years.
 
Last edited:
rustbucket- i was only half serious there. nevertheless, isn't it clear those/these Lakers were/are some kind of bad matchup for the Jazz (and everyone else)?


I have to hear this from Lakers fans all the time. The Lakers have definately gave us a few problems over the last 10 years. Very few. What about the ten years before that? Its not ancient history. Well, not quite yet anyway. But the Utah Jazz ran the Lakers for 12 years. Im not going to give the Lakers credit for kicking us while we were down, when we were punching em' out when they were on top. Im sorry, I wont do it.
 
In the first quarter, Memo looked fat and slow. His defense was atrocious (misplayed PnR's twice, and got beat off the dribble really bad by another big man).

Aren't you the guy that is always bashing just about every Jazz players defense, and getting beat by their man thereof?
I'm pretty sure we're all aware of Okur's negatives on the defensive end, as that's nothing new....
For one thing, the guy is still rusty and obviously not 100 percent.
And for another, putting up those kind of offensive numbers, while still obviously being out of shape would be a god send to the Jazz.
Anyone who ignores the fact that the Jazz's spacing on the floor was very bad this past season, is absolutely delusional.
Now unless the Jazz can get a decent shooter to space the floor (which the most likely won't), Okur is most definitely the best option. With the post players the Jazz have now, Okur is a great compliment at spacing, and bring the big guys out of the paint so Big Al, Millsap, Favors, and Kanter can all go to work.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
Aren't you the guy that is always bashing just about every Jazz players defense, and getting beat by their man thereof?
I'm pretty sure we're all aware of Okur's negatives on the defensive end, as that's nothing new....
For one thing, the guy is still rusty and obviously not 100 percent.
And for another, putting up those kind of offensive numbers, while still obviously being out of shape would be a god send to the Jazz.
Anyone who ignores the fact that the Jazz's spacing on the floor was very bad this past season, is absolutely delusional.
Now unless the Jazz can get a decent shooter to space the floor (which the most likely won't), Okur is most definitely the best option. With the post players the Jazz have now, Okur is a great compliment at spacing, and bring the big guys out of the paint so Big Al, Millsap, Favors, and Kanter can all go to work.

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
The Jazz are going to have enough minutes to split between 5 players. You read it here.
 
The Jazz are going to have enough minutes to split between 5 players. You read it here.

I'm assuming you were arguing that the Jazz "won't" have enough time to log five bigs?
Who's to say the Jazz won't send Kanter or Favors down to the D-league for a bit? Who's to say Paul Millsap won't be able to be successful logging half of his minutes a game at the 3??
A little open mindedness here please


Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
I'm assuming you were arguing that the Jazz "won't" have enough time to log five bigs?
Who's to say the Jazz won't send Kanter or Favors down to the D-league for a bit? Who's to say Paul Millsap won't be able to be successful logging half of his minutes a game at the 3??
A little open mindedness here please


Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk

Or Memo's the odd man out. A little open mindedness here please.
 
Wow. See what happens when you have a lockout? Three pages of absolutely unreadable, worthless banter on the worth of a big Turk who can shoot. Wow. Owners, get your revenue sharing **** in order so we can end this lockout.
 
Wow. See what happens when you have a lockout? Three pages of absolutely unreadable, worthless banter on the worth of a big Turk who can shoot. Wow. Owners, get your revenue sharing **** in order so we can end this lockout.

Good luck on the lockout buddy. The owners and the league are all a bunch of "you know what's".

Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
 
I'm assuming you were arguing that the Jazz "won't" have enough time to log five bigs?
Who's to say the Jazz won't send Kanter or Favors down to the D-league for a bit? Who's to say Paul Millsap won't be able to be successful logging half of his minutes a game at the 3??
A little open mindedness here please


Sent from my ADR6300 using Tapatalk
And who's to say one or two of them won't be injured for a few, or heaven forbid, a lot of games. Injuries happen. Much better to have a deep team with guys grumbling a bit about PT, than have to go with an Elson or Collins type player because you've traded away a big and are short-handed after an injury.
 
Aren't you the guy that is always bashing just about every Jazz players defense, and getting beat by their man thereof?
I'm the guy bashing players who are lazy in transition and team D. There are many players I don't bash for these reasons: AK, Earl, Millsap, Favors, etc.
 
I would completely lose my marbles if Favors was sent to the D-League.
 
Back
Top