What's new
By:

Millsap > Boozer

Sloanfeld said:
Let's revisit this topic in the playoffs. After all, Boozer has NEVER missed a playoff game. You are overrating the regular season. Every team has injuries, except the Thunder.
Click to expand...

Been in them? Sure. Showed up?


And maybe if he played during the regular season we would have been more prepared and/or had a better seed. Hard to incorporate a player during the playoffs that hasn't played with your team for 1/2 the season.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Been in them? Sure. Showed up?


And maybe if he played during the regular season we would have been more prepared and/or had a better seed. Hard to incorporate a player during the playoffs that hasn't played with your team for 1/2 the season.
Click to expand...

It's no use with you people, it's like arguing with a liberal. First off, we didn't even make the playoffs his first two years and weren't a true contender anyway. After that he only missed significant time for one season. And we had other injuries too. Just forget it, next Wednesday you will all be looking like the fools that you are.
 
Sloanfeld said:
It's no use with you people, it's like arguing with a liberal. First off, we didn't even make the playoffs his first two years and weren't a true contender anyway. After that he only missed significant time for one season. And we had other injuries too. Just forget it, next Wednesday you will all be looking like the fools that you are.
Click to expand...

The problem is the same problem with lots of arguments on this (and any) forum. It is also what makes it fun. It is mostly about opinions. You are arguing your opinion, I argue mine, etc. There are no "facts" to back up either side because it is primarily conjecture. Team chemistry and personal effort are subjective, they cannot be measured. And stats exist within the context of those other intangibles, so stats cannot be used to argue the whole story. Or we are arguing "what if" scenarios and I like mine more than yours. We can back them up with all kinds of stuff but in the end it is still a "what if". Same with the "future performance" arguments. CJ will be an all-star some day vs. CJ will be out of the league some day.

So really no matter what Boozer does we won't look like fools because you cannot PROVE that he would have had the same, or any, impact on this team. The context is different. It is conjecture.

Isn't it great!
 
Boozer offensively is one of the best bigmen in the game.

Defensively he's worthless.

But what does it matter when he can't stay healthy?
 
Sloanfeld said:
Boozer has NEVER missed a playoff game.
Click to expand...

For whatever reason, this reminded me of my favorite Boozer moment in Utah: the year he blew off 2/3 of the season with some injury and then showed up on locker cleanout day and announced he was fully healed and ready to go. Classic Boozer.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Healthy Boozer = Big Foot




Both are rarely seen.
Click to expand...

I got this unsigned negrep on this post.

boozer hatin is so old
Click to expand...

I say not as long as Boozer homers insist on endlessly starting new threads about Boozer and how he is obviously greater than Malone ever hoped to be (calm down folks, that is called hyperbole...learn to not take everything so literal). As soon as those threads stop the Boozer hate will fade.

For the record I don't hate Boozer. I think some on this forum vastly over-rate him, but I liked him when he was here and when he played. Not many players have his footwork around the basket on offense.

But seriously, not many players stand and watch as their defensive assignment waltzes past him to the rim like Boozer did either.
 
Millstud has been tough, and played through pain. His biggest problem or dissapointment has been his defense. I don't see much effort there.
His lack of rebounding has been a let down as well. He has developed his offensive game a little more this season. I just hope we he is 100% again
we see the defensive effort.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top