The stats and actual comparisons are good, but the extra corny stuff was bad.I found it kind of corny too. Tbh.
Simmons had 27/15/13/4/1 against cavaliers today. The jazz have now won 5 in a roll without Embiid. Posters here who.said simmons have good stats because of Embiid obviously have no clue.
Granted, he’s done very well. . . but let’s not pretend that 3rd in the East is as impressive as 4th in the West - especially coming from the Northwest division. 4 of the 8 teams in the West are coming from the Northwest. Jazz are 32-17 against Western Conference teams. Only Houston (40) and Golden State (33) have more wins against Western Conference teams than the Jazz do.Simmons had 27/15/13/4/1 against cavaliers today. The jazz have now won 5 in a roll without Embiid. Posters here who.said simmons have good stats because of Embiid obviously have no clue.
Simmons had 27/15/13/4/1 against cavaliers today. The jazz have now won 5 in a roll without Embiid. Posters here who.said simmons have good stats because of Embiid obviously have no clue.
The difference in the answers of Simmons and Donovan are about as far apart as you can get. Nothing makes me want Donovan to be ROY more than to snub an arrogant attitude. “People who know the game know”.......mmmmm they know you disappear in 4th quarters to bud?
http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=23071729
It isn’t harsh. I’ve tried to watch as many games of his as possible, I have league pass, and even the game against the Cavs he was far less impactful the second half and 4th quarter than he was the first half. Harsh? Or a major flaw in his game that teams will exploit when it really comes down to it? He’s extremly talented and an amazing player with amazing vision, but if we are going to look at his stats and numbers to justify how great he is, we can also look at his stats and numbers in 4th quarters to show us he disappears a lot in those times.I think this is a little harsh. He seems to avoid the ball late in games due to his poor ft shooting. Being intentionally fouled makes him shift his role. He needs to sought that out no doubt. But being a poor ft shooter doesn't reduce his overall impact much. He could go ahead and get to the line a million times in the 4th. Probably should at times. He is definitely an Alpha - just a different type imo.
What I think will be interesting though is the FACT that teams will intentionally foul him in the playoffs. If he can't come through that it will be a bad look.
It isn’t harsh. I’ve tried to watch as many games of his as possible, I have league pass, and even the game against the Cavs he was far less impactful the second half and 4th quarter than he was the first half. Harsh? Or a major flaw in his game that teams will exploit when it really comes down to it? He’s extremly talented and an amazing player with amazing vision, but if we are going to look at his stats and numbers to justify how great he is, we can also look at his stats and numbers in 4th quarters to show us he disappears a lot in those times.
Impossible to tell. He’s an outlier. Off the chart. His learning curve is amazing. Can’t wait to see how he handles the playoffs.Well, he kind of fixed that efficiency problem apparently. How good is he foing to be....