Curry and it's not even close.
And I'm probably one of the biggest lebron fans on this site.
If anyone says lebron then they are a dumbass.
(Cue ignacio)
You no dummy doeWow.. I would have said Curry, but that ^ makes me realize I actually think it should be Lebron.
Maybe bron should choose his teammates better.I could see an argument for Lebron.
What did Love and Kyrie ever win without him?
Draymond Green and Klay Thompson look like way better players than Love/Irving.
Great post and I especially agree that there should have been other unanimous mvp's. Michael Jordan was never unanimous? Come onAs Fish said, it's Curry and it's not even close....and he should've been unanimous but not the first unanimous MVP, there were so many before him that deserved it unanimously as well. In particular LBJ back in 2013. I love this LeBron though, I don't want him being a Curry nut hugger, I want him to HATE the Dubs....LBJ is on a mission this season.
Great post and I especially agree that there should have been other unanimous mvp's. Michael Jordan was never unanimous? Come on
Lol Lebron, and it's not even close. Curry is a one dimensional, lucky, ref-groomed twink.
You bandwagoners will eat crow after my Thunder crushes this overblown hype that NBA throws every few years when a new player starts playing well for a year or two. LMFAO.
This is probably about right. Though I still think curry was plenty valuable to his team.The award should be MOP. Nobody cares who is most valuable. Only who is best. Curry was clearly most outstanding or best player. An argument can certainly be made that LeBron is most valuable.
I think we mostly agree. Bottom line, every sports league should change the name of the award to MOP. That's really what voters are voting for and valuable is next to impossible to measure anyway. Best is easier to measure and it's what people care about.This is probably about right. Though I still think curry was plenty valuable to his team.
The warriors would have won a lot of games without curry (they have lots of good players) but no where near 73. That number is staggering.
The cavs would have won a lot of games without lebron too (He has some really good teammates too) but not 57 (iirc).
They are both very valuable and lebron could very well have a better playoffs and out play him in the playoffs and if that's the case then he will get the mvp for the finals/playoffs.
But as for regular season, what curry did was have one of the best individual seasons ever and break lots of individual all time records and have his team win 73 games.
Curry's regular season was special. The type that we won't see for a long time (I mean when was the last time a team one 73 games. I don't think we will see that again soon).
LeBron had a great regular season this year. So did leonard and durant and westbrook and others.
Curry's season was different and unique and stood out.
There's definitely a case for Lebron. Curry is the best shooter on the planet, but Lebron is still the best all around player in the game.