Most ridiculous argument NBA fans make, ever.
So serious question.
What's more likely. SAC wins more games trading Cousins for either Gobert or Favors or Utah wins more with Cousins in the frontcourt?
Haha.. I can already hear the replies. Grabbing popcorn, brb.
Well we already saw how one UK spoiled kid who took plays off and only played defense when convenient to him and was worried about his stats worked out for the Jazz W/L record. So I am going to say Jazz get the raw end of that deal. But there is not doubt he can play well so maybe if he isnt crying or taking plays off and a coach gets him to play with his team and not be a distraction he is going to be great. But that is a big if. What happens if he ever makes the playoffs. I dont see him handling that intensity well.
I know he is your "buddy" so you got to stick up for him.
And no, it is not ridiculous to say that a player with good stats whos team loses is not helping the team win. Gay is a great example of that, Memphis got a lot better after he got hurt and got traded. But he was putting up big stats for that team. Jazz would have won less games last year (especially post all-star break) if we took Favors or Gobert off the team and put cryin Cousins on it. Good players find ways to help their team win even if they dont have a great team around them. Although you are arguing he does have a great team around him this year so I guess we will see how he does with a great team.