What's new

NBA Players with most Win Shares in the 90's

Interesting. However it equaled exactly zero rings. So. Yeah.
 
If Jordan didn't miss those games to play baseball, he would probably be number 1, at least number 2.
 
Interesting. However it equaled exactly zero rings. So. Yeah.

Debbie_Downer.PNG
 
Well to me championships are more important then win shares but to each his own I guess


QUOTE=Tak;1467414]Good thing they are talking about win shares and not rings then.[/QUOTE]
 
On a related note, I've been carrying a Fleer Karl Malone 97/98 card in my wallet for well nigh 20 years now.
 
Well to me championships are more important then win shares but to each his own I guess


QUOTE=Tak;1467414]Good thing they are talking about win shares and not rings then.
[/QUOTE]

As a punishment for yourself, God banished you to Colorado. And there you will love with your mother, a virgin these many years... to search out forums for comparing Johnson's. And thus it is written, and thus it is done.
 
Good thing they are talking about win shares and not rings then.

That was the part where I said "interesting". The rest of it provides relevancy.
 
Utah never truly had a big 3 IMO. Stockton was in severe decline when they finally made the finals (12/8.5) and Hornacek was an old man as well (14/4). Malone was the only one holding that crew together. The reason he tops that list is because he was a true Iron Man.

Stockton wasn't in decline. The pace had slowed down tremendously.
 
Stockton wasn't in decline. The pace had slowed down tremendously.

Not a bad observation but the guy was 35. Sloan would obviously slow pace to match a declining player. Pace didn't slow that much those three years as Stockton clearly did. That squad peaked in 1996 and would have beat the Bulls if they could have gotten past the Sonics. Malone pounded that team and Stock got shut down by The Glove. That 4-3 loss was as tough as fumbling the finals.
 
Not a bad observation but the guy was 35. Sloan would obviously slow pace to match a declining player. Pace didn't slow that much those three years as Stockton clearly did. That squad peaked in 1996 and would have beat the Bulls if they could have gotten past the Sonics. Malone pounded that team and Stock got shut down by The Glove. That 4-3 loss was as tough as fumbling the finals.

The whole league slowed down tremendously. And yes, Stockton played a 4-5 fewer minutes a game. Here's a crazy stat, though. Stockton lead the league in offensive rating(or as B-Ref describes it: number of points produced by a player per hundred total individual possessions) in 99/00 and 00/01. At 38 and 39, in other words.
 
Back
Top